Springer v. Adams et al, No. 7:2012cv00336 - Document 54 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 1/22/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
ct s OFFI E U,S, :T COUU zRK' C DI . AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I T H E U NI N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U R T CT FO R T H E W ESTERN DI STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANO KE DI SI VI ON J 22 2 1 AN 23 JULA . D I LERK :Y; r(Dt7 L RK )2 !N' LEV I SPR IN G ER, Pl ntf , ai if C i lA c i N o.7: 2c vi ton 1 v00336 V. M EM O R AN D U M O PI I N N O SG T.AD AM S,e/al, . Def endant s. By:Sam uelG .W is l on U nied St esD i tri Judge t at s ct Thi ma tr i be or t cou t on Sprng ' t oton f pr s te s f e he r i ers t i or oduci of d e nt' m ton ef nda ' ( c tNo 4 )i whih he a k te c u tt drc t e Clr t s r e h s c mpan u n Do ke . 7 n c s s h o r o ie t h ek o e v i o lit po de ç ntW ie Cot y. Fort r as saed he en,t co tde e Sprnge ' moto a f nda s mt he e ons t t r i he ur ni s i rs i n nd s as u pont di m i s s Sprnge ' c a m a i tW i e Cot y. e s se i r s l i ga ns s mt Sprnge ' onl a l ton agans W ie Cot y i t ti f ie t fl a dic r moto i rs y lega i i t s mt s ha t a ld o ie s ove y in i a crm i pr e ng t w hi h he w as t com pl na a a l ge vi tm . Spr nge a g n i nal oce di o c he ai nt nd le d c i i r r ues t t bec us t di c ha a e he s over m o i n w a not tl d,t pr e ut neve s t vi o e de e y to s i e he os c or r aw he de vi nc de c i t alege c i i l a tviy,ml t , t c i i a ton w as di m i s d. Spr nge pi tng he l d r m na c i t d hus he rm nal c i s se i r s a e , ho e r t t not ng i t r c d ac ua l i c t s w hy t crm i l m a t r w a t t s w ve , ha hi n he e or t ly ndi a e he i na te s dimi s d. s se To sae a cai f r i unde 51 tt l m or elef r 983,a pli if mus alege fcs i c tng t t antf t l a t ndiai ha pl i ifhas be n de i d of rght gua a e d by t Cons iuton o l w s oft U nie St t s a ntf e pr ve i s r nt e he tt i r a he t d a e a t tt sde i ton r ule fom c nd ha hi prvai es t d r onduc c t omm it by aper o a tng unde c orofsae ted s n ci r ol tt lw. W es v.At ns 487 U. 42 (988 . The c tfndst tSprnge ' aleg i ag ns a t ki , S. 1 ) our i ha i rs l atons ai t W ie Count do not sa e a cli of c tt i l magniude a t e or ,t co twil s y tt am onsiutona t nd, her f e he ur l di m i Spri s ss nger' cl m agai t t Cot t and t s ai ns he my ermi e t Count as a def nat he y endant t t s o hi a ton. Furhe ,be us t Count i no l ng r a def nda t t s a ton,Spr nge ' m oton ci t r ca e he y s o e e nt o hi c i i rs i r ues i t cour t s ve hi c pl ntupon t Co m t w ilbe de ed a m oot eq tng he t o er s om ai he t y l ni s . The Cl r i diece t s nd a co of t s me or ndum opi on a a co pa ng e k s r td o e py hi m a ni nd c m nyi M . or rt t pa tes de o he r i . '' ..#' .,' .. v* a# ' . Z EN TER : s Thi da ofJ nua y, 3. y a r 201 lniedStt DititJ ' t aes src udge V

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.