Barbour v. Virginia Department of Corrections Western Regional Director, No. 7:2012cv00298 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 07/10/2012. (kab)

Download PDF
r PRK'AT CE u,:.Dl K URT u S CFFS sT. ROANOKEIVA FI LED I T H E UN I N TED STATE S DI STR I CO UR T CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A R OA N O K E DIV ISIO N JUL 12 2 1 22 K L G, DL l % BY: K ENN ETH ED W AR D BAR BO U R , Pl ntf , ai if C R Ci lA cton No.7: vvi i 12-c 00298 V. DE M EM O R AN D UM O PINIO N V I G I A DEPA R TM EN T O F R NI C O R REC TI N S W E STER N O R EG IO NA L D IREC TO R , D ef endant s. By: H on.Jam es C .T urk Seni U nied St es Di ri Judge or t at st ct Pl ntf K e t Ba bour a V igi a i a e pr e ng p o K ,tl a c vi r g s ai if nne h r , r ni nm t oc edi r i ed i l i ht c mpan, t s n t 4 U. C. 1 3wi j rs ito v se i 2 U. C. 1 4 Plitf o lit pz ua t o 2 S. j 98 t u idcin e td n 8 S. j 3 3. anif r h di nots i pa e f t $350 flng f wih hi c ai bu fl d fna a doc nt d ubm t ym nt or he ii ee t s ompl nt t ie i ncil ume s is n uppor ofar uett pr e t f mapa rs See28U. C.jj1 4() 1 5.Plitf t eq s o oce d q or upei. S. 91 a , 91 anif ha a l as t e non- be ci lc pl nt o a a s pr vi l di m i s a f i ousorf d t e t hr e ha as vi om ai s r ppe l e ousy s s ed s r vol or f lng t sa e a c ai upon w hi r lefm a be g a t d. Se ,e. , r urv.Vi c ni D e . aii o t t l m ch e i y r ne e c. Ba bo r i a pt of Cor.e a.7: c 00091( . Va. . 2009 ,Ba bo v.Stnf d,e a.7: - 00 r, t l, 09-vW D. Apr 8, ) r ur a or t l, 09cv- 077 . ( . Va Apr 7, W D. . . 2009) Babourv.Vici aDe . Con- 7: c 00083( . Va, .6, , . r r ni ptof . 09-v, W D. Apr 2009) . l a c da ewih t tr esrkespr sonof28U. C.j1 5( ,t cou t n c or nc t he h e -ti ovii S. 91 g) he r pr viusy a s pli ift the ne de t s tt $35 00 tlng f e o e t bls a e o l dvied a ntf ha e d o ubmi he 0. ii e r sa ih n i mi m nentt eatofserousphysi hnr t pr hr i cal m o oceed w ih a ci lsui. See,e. ,Bar t vi t :. bourv. Ke fe Commis resa VDOC', 7: c 001 ( . Va. a 1 2009) Afe efe s ai t s No. 09-v- 54 W D. M y 2, . tr r ew i pl ntf s s i i i t s ci lacton,i i cl t pl ntf doesnotalege any evi ng ai if ubm ss ons n hi vi i t s ear hat ai if l fcsi c tngt thei c r ntyunde a i ne tr a ofan s ro physc ij y a t ndiai ha s ure l r ny mmi nt h e t y eius ialnur wihi t me ni o 28U. C.j1 5( .Ba e ont fr goi a t c an,t co t t n he a ng f S. 91 g) s d he o e ng nd he omplit he ur RK fndst tpli iff ist de onsr t a i i n da rofs rousphysc ha m i t i ha antf a l o m ta e ny mm ne t nge ei i al r n he c ompli a pl ntf ha no pa dt $350. flngf e d piebei pr vi l advie of ant nd ai if s t i he 00 ii e es t ng e ousy sd ha ngtleesrkes Ac di y,t co tde e pli ifsi idmoi t pr e t f ma vi lr ti . cor ngl he ur nis antf mple ton o oc ed q or p u ei a d s se t ec mpan wi o t rj dc f rf i r t p yt etl f ea tetme a p rs nd imis s h o lit t u p eu ie o al e o a h ii e th i h u ng offlngt c an .Se eg.Duprçv. l r 28 F. 1 1 ( 1h Ci.2002 ii he omplit e, . , e Pame, 4 3d 234, 237 1 t r ) (e oni t tt flng fei dueuponflngacvia tonwhe . f mapa i pr sons ras ng ha he ii e s ii i l ci nt or q upers ovii do no a y t pl i ifa t tt c t snotr q r d t pe m i pl i ifa opport t t pa t ppl o a ntf nd ha he our i e ui e o r t a ntf n tmiy o y t flngfea trde ngla t pr e dt fr pa rs.M o e r t c t rii st t he ii e fe nyi e ve o oc e q oma upei) r ove ,he our cette ha a a aloft sor rwoul notbetkeni goodf t purua t 28U. C.j1 5()3) n ppe hi de d a n aih, s nt o S. 91 a( . TheClr i die t d t s nd co e oft sM e o a um Opi on a t ac ompa ng ek s rce o e pis hi m r nd ni nd he c nyi Or rt pl i if de o a ntf . ENTER:'hi Jz - . d yo J l, 201 r s pX ' a f uy 2. 1 rU nie St t s ' rc J o td ae i t udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.