Smith v. Lacy et al, No. 7:2012cv00217 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 05/17/2012. (rkc)

Download PDF
r w- s OF GEt.s. s' COURT l FI J Dl r . AT ROANOKE, VA FCED L MA 17 2 1 Y 22 I TH E U N I N TED STAT ES D I STR I T C O U R T C FO R TH E W E STE RN D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A RO AN O K E D IV ISIo N J I C. R CL ULA DUDk ERK nK K EITH L .SM ITH , Pl nt f ai i f, Ci lA ct on N o.7: vi i 12cv00217 V. M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O SAM L AC Y and D . A BSH I E , L. R D ef endants. By:Sam ue G .W is l l on Unied Stat Di t ctJudge t es s ri Thi i a aci i or s s n ton nf mapau rspurua t Til Vl oft Ci lRi sAc o 1 pe i s nt o te l he vi ght t f 964, 42U. C.j2000e ets q.( S. , e 2006) bypr s pl ntf Ket L.Smih a i tt Vigi a , o e ai if ih t gans wo r ni De rm e ofTr po tton s r ior ,Sn La y a D. Abs r Smih al ge t tLa y pa t nt ans ra i upe vs s m c nd L. hie. t le s ha c a Abs r ha ç os s ont wal'i t rwor ae a VDOT whieSmih waswor nga nd hie d t ell he l' n hei k ras t no l t ki t t VD OT s gn de rm e . He c a m st sdi pl y ca e hi t f rf hi lf a l a t he i pa t nt l i hi s a us d m o ea or s ie nd e ve he w or pl c N ow ,Sm ih c ai s hi t por r e pl en a nc w ilno l rs nd hi on k a e. t l m , s em a y- m oym t ge y l onge e m as i sgnme s nt . l i w e le t bls d t ts r i or a e no la e i t i i vi lc pa te unde t s l s a i he ha upe v s s r t i bl n he r ndi dua a cii s r Til Vl.Lisuv.S. te l sa FoodSvc.l ,1 F.d 1 1 (t Ci.1 (t a l i o Til . nc. 59 3 77, 80 4h r 998) 4 nayss f te An V l ' l ng ge a is r m e a s he e l dsust ...c l t ts r s sar notla e i l s a ua nd t e di l c m ea o onc ude ha upe vi or e i bl n t i i vi lca ciisf Til VI vi ai .).Rahe ,Co r si e dt templyes her ndi dua pa te or te I oltons' t r nges ntnde ha o r s d be la e f rTil V I vi a i . l a 1 1 Sm ih t r or f ist s a e a c a m o houl i bl o te I ol tons d. t 8 . t he ef e a l o t t l i n w hi h t c tm ay g a r le . A c or ngl t c tw ilg an Sm ih' a i a i t c he our r nt e i f c di y, he our l r t t s pplc ton o p o e di o mapau rsa dd s s, t o t rj d c a dp ru n t 2 U. C. r c e nf r pe i n imis wi u p eu ie n u s a t o 8 S. j h 1 5()2)B)i) Smih' Til Vl a tona ns hi worpl es pe v' 91 e( ( (i, t s te 1 ci gai t s k ac u r r EN TER :M ay 17,2012. UN I TED STA TES DISTRI JU D GE CT *

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.