-RSB Johnson v. Doe, No. 7:2012cv00112 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/14/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U.. DI COURT : CE s ST. AT DANVILE VA L : 4' uo : I TH E U NI N TED ST ATE S D I STR I CO UR T CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A R O A NO K E DIV ISIO N LA RR Y R AY JO H N SO N , Pl nt f , ai if V. JO H N D O E , D ef endant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MA2 1i 2 1 22 JU I C. DLE C A Y BY: DEPUTY CL ERK C i lA cton N o.7:12- 00112 vi i cv- M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O By: H o Jac t o L.K i e n. ls n sr Se or Uni e St t s Di t i tJudge ni t d a e sr c La r Ra J r y y ohns a V i gi a i a e pr e ng pr K , ie a c vi r gh s c pl i , on, r ni nm t oce di o f l d i l i t om a nt . whihlc n tu a p ua t o4 U. C. 1 8 wihj rs ito v se i 28U.. j 1 4 . c o sr e s ms n t 2 S. j 9 3 t u id ci n e td n SC. 3 3 Pli tf di nots a n if d ubmi pa e oft $350 slng f e wih hi co pl i . Se 28U. C. t ym nt he i e t s m ant e S. j1 4() Pli ifha a la tt e non- be scvi c ansora l prvi l dimis 91 a . antf d t e s hr e ha a i l omplit ppeas e ousy s sed a f i ous asm a i i , f f ii t sa e a cl i upon w hi h r le m a be gr nt Se s r vol , lc ous or or a lng o t t am c ei f y a ed. e, eg.J hns v.Sa r, 7: cv. , o on undes No. 92- 00820( . Va. t 26,1 ( s s i a ton W D. Oc. 992) dimisng ci wi u p eu iea et e fio o o maiius pzs n t 2 U. C. 1 5 d ) J hn o v. t t rj dc s ih r rv lus r lco , l ua t o 8 S. j 91 ()' o s n ho r , Lo , 7:2-v 0 7 2 ( . Va Oc . 5 1 9 )( imisn a o wih u prj iea et e we No. 9 c - 0 9 W D. . t 1 , 9 2 ds sig din to t eudc s ih r fi ousormaiius purua t 28U. C.j1 ( ) J onv.Sa r, 7:2-v- 01 rvol lco , s nt o S. 915d)' ohns , undes No. 9 / 006 ( . Va J y31 1 9 )( imisn a to wi o tp eu iea et rfi lu o maiiu , W D. . ul , 9 2 d s sig cin t u rj d c s i rvoo s r l o s h he c purua t 28U. C.j191 d).Se aloM cxa v. td Stt ,566F. 391 399( hCi. s nt o S. 5( ) e s l n Unie aes 3d , 4t r 2 0 )(o igt td s saswih u p eu iea fioo ss o l c un a at tie'o 0 9 n tn ha imis l t o t rj dc s rv lu h ud o t s i rk 'f r s pumos sof28U. C.j 1 ( ) I a or nc wiht t e srke pr sonof28U. C. e S. 915g). n cc da e t he hre-ti s ovii S. j1 5( ,hecoul pr ousyad s dpli ift thene de t s tt $350. flngfeor 91 g)t ' evi l vie antf ha t e d o ubmi he 00 ii e esa ih a i i ntt e tofs rousphysc ha m t pr e wih a cvi s t See,e. , t bls n mm ne hr a ei ial r o oc ed t i l ui. R. Johnson v.Br on,N o.7: cvaxt 04- 00080, si op. t12 ( . Va. lp a - W D. Feb.1 2004) 9, . Afe r vi ngpl ntf ss iso i t sc vi aci i i cea t tpli ifdoe no tr e ewi ai if ubm s ins n hi i l ton, t s l r ha antf s t a l ge a f c s i c tng t the i c r nty unde a i m i nttzea ofa s i phys c l le ny a t ndi a i ha s ur e l r ny m ne lr t ny erous ia ij ywihi t me ni of28U. C.j1 5( .Acc di y,ldimist acinwihou nur t n he a ng S. 91 g) or ngl s s he to t t prj c f pli ifsfiur t pa t flngfea t tmeofflngt c ant Se ,e. , eudie or antf' al e o y he ii e t he i ii he ompli . e g. Du rev Pame, 8 F.d 1 3 1 7( 1hCi. 0 2 (e s nngt a t efln fei d eu o p e . l r 2 4 3 2 4, 23 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i h t h iig e s u p n flngacvia in whenj f mapaupei pr sonsdonota yt pli ifa t tt c t ii i l cto . or q rs ovii ppl o antf nd ha he our i notr qui e t per i pl i ifan o s e r d o m t a ntf pporuniy t pay t flng f a t rr cogni i pl i ifi t t o he ii ee f e e z ng a ntf s i lgi et pr ee L f mapa rs. nei bl o oc d q or upe i) TheClr i diec e t s nd c esoft sM e or ndum Opi on a t a c e k s r t d o e opi hi m a ni nd he c ompa ng nyi Or rt pl i i f de o a ntf . EN TER : Thi s t lG dyo Mac , 201 t' a f rh 2. e * Se i r Unied St t sD i ti tJ o t a sr c udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
