-RSB Depaolis v. Clark et al, No. 7:2012cv00103 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/7/12. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DANIELE DEPAOLIS, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00103 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge By Order entered March 9, 2012, the court directed plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint that complies with Rules 8 and 10, Fed. R. Civ. P, and to file financial documents to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a). The Order advised plaintiff that failing to respond within twenty days would result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice. More than twenty days have passed, and plaintiff has not complied with the March 9, 2012, Order or contacted the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice for failing to comply with the court s March 9, 2012, Order and for failing to prosecute this action. Plaintiff may refile his claims in a new and separate action at a time of his choice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. Entered: May 7, 2012 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
