-RSB Chatman v. Unknown, No. 7:2012cv00091 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 2/27/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cÅ nK' OFFI U.S. ST COURT s CE DI . A R 4NOK V T O-' E,A r r$,!7 -iE$h '- i2 IN T H E U N I D STATE S D I TE STR I T C O U R T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI K EN NET H TYR O N CH ATM A N , Pe i i r, t tone V. UNKNOW N, Res pondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FEB 2 7 2 1 22 J AC ULI BY; D C RK C Ci lA ct on N o.7: c 00091 vi i 12- v- M EM O R AN DU M O PI I N N O By: Sam ue G . is l W lon U nie St e Di t i Judge t d at s s r ct Pe ii r K e t Tyr n Cha m a a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr s f l d t s ttone nne h o t n, r ni nm t oce di o e, ie hi peii f wrtofha asc puspurua t 28U. C.j2254,c le nghi c cin i t tton or i be or s nt o S. halngi s onvito n he Lynch g Cic t Cour. The co tfnds t t Cha ma ha f l t e us hi sae c t bur r ui t ur i ha t n s aied o xha t s t t our r m e esbe o e flng t sf der lha aspe ii a t e or dimi s hi pe ii wiho e di f r ii hi e a be tton nd, her f e, s s es s tton t ut p eu ie1 rj d c . 1. On Apr l24,2009,t Lync i he hbur Cic t Cour c g r ui t onvi t Cha m an oft o c c ed t w ount ofus s e ofa fr n m i t c ie r n he omm ison ofa f ony,one c mtofmtr -e o homi i one co of si el ot lderf l ny cde, unt m alci w oundi one c i ous ng, ount of m alc o l s i or t owi a m i s l a a oc upi i i us y hootng hr ng s ie t n c ed ve c e a one c hi l , nd ount ofpos es i ofa fr a m by a c s s on ie r onvi t d f l a s nt nc hi t 30 c e e on, nd e e ed m o yea s i a c r ton. Cha m an s a e t the di not a aland di notf l pe ii f r wrt of r nc r e a i t t t s ha d ppe d ie tton o i c r i r r t t Supr e Cour of t Unie St t . Cha ma fld a ha s pe ii i t e to a i o he em t he t d a es t n ie bea tton n he Ly hbur Cicui Cour on M a 5, 201 whi h t cour dimi s d on Aug t 2, 201 nc g r t t y 0, c he t s se us 0. Cha m a doe not a l ge t t he ha pur ue hi s a e ha s pe ii t t Supr m e Cour of t n s le ha s s d s t t bea tton o he e t V igi a a s a e c tonlne r or c im t the ha no .2 r ni nd t t our i ec ds onfr ha s t 'Furhe i a r t tChat a speii i untm el fl . t r t ppea s ha m n' tton s i y ied 2I fc,Cham a sae t thec r ntyha a a lpe ngi t Cour ofAppeasofV igi a. t n t ts ha ure l s n ppea ndi n he t l r ni n at I I. A f de alc tc e r our annot g a t a ha as pe ii t e s t peii r has e use t rn be tton mls he ttone xha t d he r m e e a ia e i t c t oft sae i whih he wa c c e Pr s rv.Rodrc , e di s va lbl n he ours he tt n c s onvit d. eie i uez 411U. 475( 973) ft peiine ha fie t e us saecour rmedis t fdea c t S. 1 -I he tto r s ald o xha t tt t e e ,he e rl our mu tds s t p tto . Sa t n v.S t,4 4 U. 5 ( 9 ) l Vigni,an n d ah rw s imis he eiin lvo mih 0 S. 3 1 71. n r i a o - e t o f l uli ael mus pr s nthi cli st t Supr m e Cour ofVigi a a r ceve a r i eon tm t y t ee s am o he e t r ni nd e i ulng fo t tc tbef ea fde a dititc tma c i rhi cl ms. Se Va.Code j 8. rm ha our, or e r l src our y onsde s ai e 01 654. I t s c e,i i cla t tChat n hi as t s e r ha man hasye t pur ue hi ha s cli s i t Su e to s s bea am n he pr me Cour ofV igi a. A c di y,t c tf ndst tCha m a spe ii i unexha t t r ni cor ngl he our i ha t n' tton s us ed. 11 1. Ba e o t f r g i ,hec u tds se Ch t n' h be speiinwih u p eu ie s d n he o e ong t o r imis s ama s a a tto t o t rj dc asune used. xha t The Cl r i diede t s nd a c riq co of t s M e a um Opi on a ek s r d o e e tted py hi mor nd ni nd ac om panyi O r rt t pe ii r c ng de o he ttone . EN TER : Thi 2 s A d yofF bray 2012. a e u r, x d ntd S ae DititJ d e ie tts src u g
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
