-RSB Morel v. District Court, No. 7:2012cv00071 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/1/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' oFFl u.s. sm couRT S cE ol ATDANVI E VA LL FLDè cg.a IE o h I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O U R T C FO R TH E W ESTERN DISTR I T O F V I G I I C R N A ROANOKE DI I O N V SI H EC TO R M O REL , Petii toner, MA2 û 1 2 1 22 aub c. bt . RK D - c EY BY: E c C i lA c i N o.7: 2- vvi ton 1 c 00071 M E M O R AND UM O PI I N N O DI STRI T C O U R T, C R es pondent . By: H on.Jacks L.K i e on sr Se or U nied St e D i t i tJudge ni t at s s r c He t M or ,a f r prs rpr e ngpr > f l d a doc e tte t ppe : c or el ede al ione oce di o q, ie um nt il d, t A al - DititCour l tuc i t Cl r ' t t Unied St t Cour ofAppe l f t Thid Cic t src t nsr ton o e k'wih he t aes t a s or he r r ui. Anatac tt t sdocume wa tte tMotonRul 35()Fe R.Crm. 'a r quetda t hmen o hi nt s ild,s i e a d. i P.' nd e se t recin ofs enc afe J d r to co ent e tr udgme i ( ty te ee on s r ie rlas r ain nt s no e ntrd) upe vs d ee e evoc to he rnga af r dee i ce e byt U. Paol CommisononNo e l3,2011' ai t edeal tnton ntr he S. r e si vlmber . 5 ( t 3. ByOr rdaedFebr r 1 201 t Clr oft Thid Cic tCour ofAppe l Pe. ) de t uay 0, 2,he ek he r rui t as consr d pe ii r sflngsass e ng $ wrtofha a c uswih r r t pa ol r vo ton tue ttone ' ii e ki 1 i a be s op t ega d o r e e cai pr e di ' and f w a ded t flngst t s c tsCl r be a e pe ii ri i a c a e oc e ngs' or r he ii o hi our ' e k c us ttone s nc r er t d wihi t sditit See28U. C.j2241a (e rngj2241ha aspeiinst befl wihi t n hi src. S. () rquii be tto o ied t n t dititofconfne nt. he src i me ) By ac tona flng or re e e on Fe u r 1 201 t c ta s d pe ii r ondii l ii de nt r d br a y 6, 2, he our dvie ttone t thi t lngs di notc or t t r qui e e sf rha aspe ii a t the m us pa t ha s i i d onf m o he e r m nt o be ttons nd ha t y he $ .0fln fe Se 2 U. C. 1 4 a ; l 1b , o t Rue Go j2 4Ca e .The 50 iig e . e 8 S. j 91 () Rue () 2 f he ls v. 25 s s c t ovi d pe ii r ff e n da t f l a a e our pr de ttone i t e ys o ie n m nded pe ii a t pa t f lng f e. tton nd o y he ii e P tto e fldhi r s o s t t ec n iina tln o d ra do j cst t eCo r o eiin r ie s e p n e o h o dto liig r e n be t o h u t f Appe s a my consde a i ofhi pl adi asapetton f a wrtofha asc pus al' nd i r ton s e ngs ii or i be or . Pe ii ttonera gue t tt c t 'c t uc i de i shi due pr es be us he s c t a l r s ha he our s ons r ton prve m oc s ca e pe ik ly w a sa die ta nt r c ppea ofhi s vi e r l as r voca i n he r ng a t f r lde e i ce t r l s uper s d e e e e to a i t he ede a t nton n e . Pettonerasks m e t r ur hi or gi m otonsand docum ent t t SuperorCourtoft ii o et n s i nal i s o he i he Diti to Col src f umbi 1c tuehi r ques a a moton t vol miy dim ist sa ton wihout a. onsr se t s i o unt l s s hi c i t p eu ies peiine ma p e e t i camst adfe e tc u t Pei o rsrq e ti ga td rj dc o t o r y r s n h s li o ifr n o r. tt ne ' e u s s rn e , t i a t Cl k s lr t n pli tf spl di t twe ef wa de t t sc q i a ia e. nd he er hal eur a n if ea ngs ha r or r d o hi our f va lbl The Cl r i diec ed t s nd a c oft s M e or ndum Opi on and t a c pa i ek s r t o e opy hi m a ni he c om ny ng O r t pettoner. der o ii ENTER: hs 1 day ofM arch,2012. T i S# - h $ Se ' U nie St t s D it i tJ e or t d a e s r c udg
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
