-RSB Barbour v. VDOC et al, No. 7:2012cv00070 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 02/21/2012. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
I TH E UN I N TED STATES DI STR I C O U RT CT FO R TH E W E STERN DI STRI O F VI G I A CT R NI R O A NO KE D I ISIO N V K EN NE TH BAR B OU R , FE2 2 1 2 1 22 J I C. L., E ULA D q LL RK Y B : DEP ,/ ERK Y ' f CA SE N O .7: 126+ 00070 Pl ntf , ai if M EM O R AND U M O PI IO N N VS. VDOC, & , c By: J me C. k a s Tur Se or U ni e St e D i t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Dee fndants. t) Pl i tf K e t Ba bour a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr K ,brngst s c vi rght a n if nne h r , r ni nm t oc edi o i hi i l i s . co an unde 42U. C.j 1 algi t tofi asa Re Oni Stt Prs ha l tt mplit r S. 983, le ng ha fcil t d on ae ion ve ef he t lti hi c l unr paiedf tveda . Pl i ifdi no s i pa m e f t $35 flng f e oie n s e l e r or i ys antf d t ubm t y nt or he 0 ii e wihhi c antbuttldfna ildoc nsi s t s ompli ie i nca ume t n uppor ofar ue tt pr e dt fr t eq s o oc e q oma pa rs Se 28U. C.jj1 4() 1 5.Afe rviwi t rc d,hecour s mmaiy upei. e S. 91 a, 91 tr e e ng he e or t t u rl dimisst acin u r28U. C.j1 5( . s se he to nde S. 91 g) Pl i ifhasha a l s tzee non- be c vi c pl i s o a a spr vi l a ntf d t ea t lr ha as i l om a nt r ppe l e ous y dimis d asfi o orf f lngt sae acai upon whi h r le m a begr nt d.Se ,e. , s se rvol us or aii o t t l m c e if y a e e g. Bmbourv. r ni DeptofCor.e a.7:9-v-0091( . Va Apr 8,2009) Babolrv. Vigi a . r. t l, 0 c 0 W D. . . . , r z Stnf dse al,7: c 00077( . Va. .7,2009 ,Babourv.Vici aDe . Cor. a or t . 09-vW D. Apr ) r . r ni ptof r, 7: c 00083( . Va. .6,2009) l a c da ewiht t e -ti spr sonof28 09-vW D. Apr . n c or nc t he hre srke ovii U. C.j 1 5() t cour prvi l a s dpli ift thene dt s tt $350. S. 91 g ,he t e ousy dvie antf ha ede o ubmi he 00 flngf ore t bls a i i ntt z a ofs rousphysca ha m t pr e wih acvi s t ii ee sa ih n mm ne h e t e i i l r o oce d t i l ui. Se ec.Babourv.Ke feeCommisre a VDOC', 7: c 0O1 4 ( . Va. a 1 e, . , r ef sais t s No. 09-v- 5 W D. M y 2, 20 ) 09 . Afe r vi ng pl i ips s isonsi t s ci la ton,i i c e r t tpli tf does tr e ewi antf ubm s i n hi vi c i t s l a ha a n if n talg a f csi iai t a tecru tn e o whc h c mpan pa ehm u d ra y o le e ny a t ndc t h t h ic msa c s f ih e o lis lc i n e n ng i ne t e t ofa srous physc lij y wihi t me ni of 28 U. C.j 1 ( . mmi nt hra ny ei ia nur t n he a ng S. 915g) Ba e on t f egoi a t compl nt t c ttndst tpl ntf f ist de onsr t a sd he or ng nd he ai , he our i ha ai if a l o m ta e ny i ne da r of s rous physc ha a pl ntf ha no pai t $350. flng f mmi nt nge ei ial nn nd ai if s t d he 00 ii ee des t bengpr vi l a s d ofha ngt e srkes Ac r ngl t co tde espl i ifs pie i e ousy dvie vi hr e ti . co di y, he ur ni antf i le moin t p o e d t fr p u ei a d ds se t c mplitwih u p eudc f r mpid t o r c e q oma a p rs n imis s he o an t o t rj ie o o f iur t pay t flng f a t tm e off lng t c m pl nt Se e. ,D upr e v.Pal e ,28 al e o he ii ee t he i ii he o ai . e, c. e m r 4 F.d 1 3 ,1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nngta tec u t sn trq rd t p r tp an ifa 3 2 4 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i h t h o r i o e uie o e mi litf n oppo t t t pa t flng fea trde ng la t pr e t f mapa rs. Morove , runiy o y he ii e fe nyi e ve o oc ed q or upe i) e r t cou tc rii t ta a he r e tfes ha n ppea oft s o de woul notbe t ken i good f t pur ua t 28 l hi r r d a n aih, s nt o U. C.j1 5()3) S. 91 a( . The Cl r i di e t d t s c esoft s M e o andum O pi on a t ac om pa ng e k s r c e o end opi hi m r ni nd he c nyi Or rt pl i if de o a ntf . ENTER:Thi 7 ? n a o F b u r , 01 . s W d y f e r ay 2 2 1 Unied St t D i t ' tJ or t a es sr udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
