-RSB Barbour v. Ley et al, No. 7:2012cv00051 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 2/3/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cf S OFF# U,, <T U ERK' CE : ' . h AT ROANOKE, A V FI : LEO F 23 2 1 EB 22 I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI STRI CO U R T CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STRIC T O F V I G IN I R A RO A N O K E DIV I SION K ENN ETH BA R BO U R, J A C. ULI DU BY: DE sCL ERK L C ASE N O .7: 12CV 00051 Pl ntf ai if, M EM O R AND U M O PI O N NI V*. 11CAC CLERK JOHN LEY,c & , By:Jame C.Tur s k Seni U nied StatesD i ri Judge or t st ct Dee fndants. t) Pli ifKe h Ba bo , Vigni i epr ee ng pr K ,tld t scvi rght a ntf nnet r ur a r i a nmat oc di o ie hi i l i s c ompli ti t Unied St t Diti tCour f t W esen DititofLouii nai J y 2011 a n n he t aes src t or he t r src sa n ul . Bas on t na ur ofBa bour sc pl i ,i whi h he s num e ous f de a c to f c al ed he t e r ' om a nt n c ued r e r l our f i i s fom arundt co r t Louiinac tfldhi a to ( viAci No.11 1 - a r o he unty,he sa our ie s cin Ci l ton - 301P) s a i i unde Bi nsv.Si Unknown N a ed A ge sofFed.Bur u ofN a co i , U . 388 r s ng r ve x m nt ea r tcs 403 S. (971,wihj iditonve t ptrua t 28U. C.j1 1.TheLouii c tooknoot 1 ) t urs ci sed zs nt o S. 33 sana our t her a to i t ca e f s x m ont . O n J nua y 31 201 t Loui i na c ti s d a o d r c i n n he s or i hs a r , 2, he s a our s ue n r e , notng t tBar ur i i ar e a e a Re O ni Stt Prs n i Po i ha bo s nc c r t d t d on e i o n und,Vi gi a,a r ni nd t a f r i t ac i n t t W es e n Di t i tofV igi a w iho f t di c s on,p s ntt r ns e rng he to o he t r sr c r ni t ut urher s us i ur ua o 28U. C.j1 S. 406.Pl nifdi no s bmipay ntf t $ flngf wihhi c antbu aitf d t u t me or he 350 ii ee t s ompli t tldfna ildoc nt i s ie i nca ume s n uppor ofarques t pr e t f t e to oc ed q onnapa rs Se 28U. C. upei. e S. jj1 4() 1 5.Afe rviwi t rc d,t c ur sz rl dimis st a to unde 28 91 a, 91 tr e e ng he e or he o t lmmaiy s se he cin r U. C.j1 5( . S. 91 g) Pl i tf ha ha a l as t r e non- be c vi c pl i s o a al m e ous y a n if s d t e t h e ha as i l om a nt r ppe s vi l dim i s d a f i ous orf r f ii t s a e a cl i upon whi h r le m a be g a e See, e. , s s e s r vol o a lng o t t am c e if y r nt d. :. Babourv. r ni DeptofCor.e a.7: -v- 091( . Va Apr 8,20094 Babo v. r Viai a . rs t l, 09c 00 W D. . . , . r ur Sa or e a.7: c 00077( . Va. . 2009 .Bar urv. r ni De t ofCor. tnf d. t 1, 09-vW D. Apr 7, ) bo Vigi a p . , r, 7: c 00083( . Va. .6,2009) I a or nc wiht t e -ti sprvii of28 09-vW D. Apr . n cc da e t he hr esrke o son U. C.j1 5( ,hecou tprviusya s dpli ift thene dt s tt $350. S. 91 g)t r e o l dvie antf ha ede o ubmi he 00 flng f oresa ih a i i ntt e tofs rousphysca ha m t pr e wih acvi s t ii ee t bls n mm ne hr a ei i l r o oce d t i l ui. Se ,e. ,Babourv. efe Commis resa VDOC', 7: c 001 4 ( . Va. a 1 e c. r Ke fe s ai t s No. 09-v- 5 W D. M y 2, 2009) . A fe r vi wi pl i ifs s i s ons i t s ci l a ton, i i c e r t t pl i tf d tr e e ng a ntf ubm s i n hi vi c i t s l a ha a n if oes no a l ge a f c s i c i t t he i c r nty unde a i m i nt t ea of a s rous t le ny a t ndi atng ha s ur e l r ny m ne hr t ny e i p ysc lij r wi n te me nig o 28 U. C.j1 1 () Ba e o t e f r g i a d te h ia nu y t h a n f hi S. 9 5 g . sd n h o e ong n h c pl n , t c t tnds t t pl i if f l t dem o t a e a i m i nt da r of s rous om ai t he our i ha a ntf ais o nsr t ny m ne nge ei physca ha m i t c i l r n he ompli and pl i ifha notpad t $350. tlng f de pie beng a nt antf s i he 00 ii ee s t i pr vi usy a s d of ha ng t ee s rkes Acc r ngl t co t de es pl i ifs i pled e o l dvi e vi hr ti . o di y, he ur ni a ntf' m i moint p o e dt fr p u ei a dd s se t ec mpan wi u p eu ief rf i r t to o r c e q o ma a p rs n imis s h o lit t t rj dc o al e o ho u pa t f lng f a t tm e offlng t c pl i t Se ,e. , upr v. l e , 4 F. 1 y he ii ee t he i ii he om a n . e a. D ee Pa m r 28 3d 234, 1 ( 1hCi.2002)(e oni t tt c ti notrquiedt pemi pli ifa opporuniy 237 1 t r ras ng ha he our s e r o r t antf n t t t pay t flng fe at de ng la t pr ee L f ma pa rs. M orove,t c t o he ii e fer nyi e ve o oc d q or upei) e r he our c r ii t t a a al of t s o der w oul not be t ke i good f ih,pur ua t 28 U . C . e tfes ha n ppe hi r d a n n at s nt o S. j1 5()3) 91 a( . The Cl k i di e e t s c esoft s M e o a er s r d d o end opi hi m r ndum Opi o a t a o pa ng ni n nd he cc m nyi Or t pl ntf . der o ai if ENTER:Ths Y i d yo F b ay 20 2. a f e nzr , 1 4. - Se orUnie St t D it tJ e ni t d a es s r udg 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
