-RSB Davidson v. Uzma et al, No. 7:2012cv00044 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/5/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
8 OFFI I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI RI T C O U RT CLERK' A CE u.s. s coU ST C y Dlm R7 o lu u A ANvL u v FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON FL D % rgr IE MA2 25 2 1 22 J L D D E CE U WC.U LY L S TR W IS LEO N D A VID SO N , Pl ntif ai f , CiiAcinNo 71-v0F4 o pry t vl to . :2c -( ' st ceRx 4 r V. M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O DR .A Ll UZM A ,etal, . D ef endant . s By: . H on.Jackson L.K i ser Seni U nied St es D i ri Judge or t at st d Pli iffld ac a ntf ie ompli and a i t a cou r por i J nua y 201 The i t a cou a nt n nma e c nt e t n a r 2. nmae c nt r por dicos d fnancildaa f M a 2011t ough Oc obe 20l1 By Or rentr Feb u y 7, 2, e t sl e i a t or y hr t r . de e ed r ar 201 t c ta s s ed a$35 flng f eand gr nt dpl ntf sfe n da fom t da eoft Or rt he our s e s 0 ii e a e ai if te ys r he t he de o f w a d t t c ta s at m e ofhi as e sa a r po tr ga di hi tus a countf t s x m on hs or r o he our t e nt s s t nd e r e r ng s r t c or he i t pr o t J nua y 2011. The co tne d t s i or a i t de e ne a pa e s he e, s ntt ir o a r ur ede hi nf m ton o t nni ym nt c dul pur ua o 28U. C.j 1 5.Pli ifwasad s dt fiur t rt nt rquie pa wor woul r ul i S. 91 antf vie hat al e o eur he e r d per k d es t n d s sa o ti a t n wih u p eudc . imis l f h s ci to t rj ie o Pl ntf di nots e nty tl a fnanc alpa r k a t ,di notc pl wih t ai i f d ubs que l i e ny i i pe wor nd, hus d om y t he co to lt lng or dej t t di m i s w a ni Fur he r ,t c tc nnotde e m i t ndii na i i der pie he s s al r ng. t nno e he our n t r ne he a opraeflngfeasesme ,purua t 28U. C.j 1 5b) bec us hi frti t a cou ppr it ii e s s nt s nto S. 91 ( , a e s is nmae c nt r por de c i t sx- ont pe i pr ort N ove be 2011 no t s x- ont pe i d pr o t J n y e t s rbed he i m h r od i o m r , t he i m h r o i r o a uar 2 2.Ac o dngy t i a to mus bed s se wi u p eudc frpli tf sf i r t pa t e 01 c r i l,h s cin t imisd t t rj ie o anif al e o y h ho u tlngfeorpr rydocume hi a i to t pr e t f mapa rs aitf ma rfl hi ii e ope l nt s pplcain o oc ed q or upei.Pl nif y eie s dai i ane a s pa ae a ton a t tm eheca pa t $350 flng f e orfl t ne es a y ms n w nd e r t c i t he i n y he ii e ie he c s r d ume st pr e L f mapaupei. oc nt o oc ed q or rs The Cl r i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e or ndum O pi o a t a om pa ng Or r ek s rce o e opy hi m a ni n nd he cc nyi de t pl ntf o ai if. Ex - : Thi rER s S+h d yo Mac , 2012. a f rh e Se rU nie St t D i ti tJ n' t d a es s r c udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
