-RSB Harris v. United States Federal Court et al, No. 7:2011cv00604 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 12/21/2011. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
rtEnrsOFFI U.:. 'X O . CE DI AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L IN TH E UN ITED STA TES D ISTR ICT CO UR T FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI O F V I G I I CT R N A R O AN O K E D I SI N VI O H O W A RD M A C K H AR R I S DEC 21 2 1 21 ' J ..' r ' j çCL uu!$ w . : ERK , ? '. BY: = L C i lA c i N o.7: - vvi ton 11 c 00604 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O R A ND U M O PI I N N O V. U NITED STA TES FED EM L C O U RT , t aI, e . D ef endant s. By:Sam uelG .W ison l U nied St es D i ri Judge t at st ct Pl ntf Howa d M ac Ha rsbrngst sa tonrr s s ki $20, 042. i ai if r k ri i hi c i o e, ee ng 744, 53 n da esfom Pr i ntBaa Oba Hilr Rodhn Clnt ( mag r esde rck ma, la y m i on whom hehaselvae i hi e td n s c antt t ofieofViePr i nt, S. t ne Ge r lErcHol r f me U. ompli o he fc c esde ) U. Ator y ne a i de ,or r S. Ato n yGe e a J h As r f,wofd r lu g s a t eDie tro t eFe rl r a o tr e n r l o n hco tt e e a j d e , nd h r co f h dea Bu e u f Prs ns l hi t pageco pl i s ki nea l $21milon,Ha rspr e sno f cua or io . n s wom ant ee ng ry li ri es nt at l l lbas st s ega i o how a r ghtt a r i w ha s ve .The c ti wholy una e t di c r a ny i o ny elef t oe r our s l bl o s e n ny pm i ul rc tt i na or s a ut y vi a i f om t c pl ntort de e ne w he hera c a ons iuto l t t or ol tons r he om ai o t nni t ny vi bl c a m s le a ns a i vi lde e an s a e l i i gai t ny ndi dua f nd t . Se ton 1 A ofTil 28oft Unie Stt Codepr vi t tCll c ts l ci 915 te he td aes o des ha tthe our hal r vi w ,be or doc tng,i f asbl or i a e ,a s a pr c i bl a t rdoc tng,a e e f e ke i f e i e , n ny vent s oon s a tca e f e ke i c pl i i a ci la ton i w hi h a prs rs e r dr s f o a go m m e ale iy or om a nt n vi c i n c i one e ks e es r m ve nt ntt o fc ro e ly eo ag v r me tl n iy' 2 U. C. 1 5 a ( 0 ) Afe s hrve fie r mpo e f o e n n a e tt . 8 S. j 91 A() 20 6 . tr uc e iw, ' a di ti tco tha t a hort t di m i st c a m i t ac i n i f i ous m a i i us orf is sr c ur s he ut iy o s s he l i f he t o s rvol , lc o , a l t saeacli onwhih rle ma begrnt j 1 5 b)1 .Fort ras nssae t c r o tt am c eif y a ed. 91 A( ( ) he e o ttd,he ou t fndst tHa sha fiedt saeacai a wilt rf edimishi co ai purua t j i ha ni s al o tt l m nd l heeor s s s mpl nt s nt o 1 5 b() 91 A( )1. EN TER :t s21 tda ofD e m ber 2011 hi s y ce , . UN I TED STA TES DISTRI J D GE CT U
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
