-RSB Adams v. Watson, No. 7:2011cv00601 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 12/20/2011. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
nl s OFFI U.. ST. pRK' CE s DI COUr A- ROANOKE, L ' VA F)73 'L I TH E U NITED STA TES DISTR ICT CO UR T N FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI O F V I G I A CT R NI RO AN O K E DIVISIO N DOM I QUE HERM AN ADAM S, NI Pet toner, ii V. BRYAN B. ATSON , W R espondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BEC 22 2 1 21 JULI C ''J Tf A ' ' BY; D Ci lA ct on N o.7:11cv00601 vi i M EM O R AND U M O PI NION By:Sam ue G.W is l lon Uni St es D i ri Judge ted at st ct Pe ii r D om i que H e m a A da s a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr s br ngs t s ttone ni r n m , r ni nm t oc edi o e, i hi peii f wrtofha scor purua t 28U. C.j2254 c lngi hi 2003c ci tton or i bea pus s nt o S. hale ng s onviton a s ntnc i t Roa nd e e e n he noke Ciy Cic tCour. Be us Ada ha fld aprvi j 2254 t rui t ca e ms s ie e ous m oto c le ng t s m e convi ton a s n e ,t c tdi m i s s hi i t ntpe ii n a i n ha l ngi he a c i nd e t nce he our s s e s ns a tto s s e s ve. ucc s i 1 . Ada s c l m halenges hi 30- a s nt nce a co c i f t o count of s a ut r s ye r e e nd nvi tons or w s tt oy bur a y,one c gl r ountofr obbe y,a one c r nd ountofm ai i woundi Cour r c ds i c t lcous ng. t e or ndi ae t tAda prvi l tld a j2254moi rgadi t s mec ci a sntnc whi ha ms e ousy ie ton e r ng he a onviton nd e e e ch t s co tdeni Se Ci lCas N o.7: 0c hi ur ed. e vi e 1 v00383. U nde t pr s ons oft f de alha a r he ovi i he e r be s saut rgadi s e ntors ce svej2254peii ,t cour ma c i ras ondor tt es e r ng ubs que uc s i ttons he t y onsde ec s ce sve j 225 peii onl upon s cfc c riiai fom t Unied Stts Coul of uc si 4 tton y pe ii e ttc ton r he t ae ' t Appe s f t Fourh Cicui t tt cl i s i t pe ii m ee c r a n c ie i . See 28 U . C . al or he t r t ha he a m n he tton t e t i rt r a S. j22 1) Bec us Ada has no s ted a e denc t t he ha obt ne s h 4447. a e ms t ubmit ny vi e ha s ai d uc c r ii t o b t Cour o Ap as t c u td s se hs p tto wih u p eu ie a e tfca i n y he t f pe l, he o r imis s i eiin to t rj dc s successi .1 ve l l f c , co tr cor i cae t t t Fourh Cicui de e Ada s'r s t fl a s co or s c sve n a t ur e ds ndi t ha he t r t nid m eque t o ie e nd uc esi a pl ainfrrle t e j2 5 S el r: mi g eHema Ad msNo. 1 1 3(t Ci.u e2 , 01 ) p i t o eifmd r 2 4. ç n e Do niu r n a , 1 -9 4h rJ n 3 2 1. c o ERK The C l r i di e t d t s nd c r ii d c esoft s m e or ndum opi on a e k s r c e o e e tt e opi hi m a ni nd ac ompa ng or rt pe ii r c nyi de o ttone . ENTER:T i'lM dyo Dee e,0 1 hs l a f cmbr2 1. , .. y. M .g y , ' . . z a ' v j . .. +; .w. .. . . , a. .. *'ef +r /. . ' # led St es D it i J t at s rct udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
