Rountree v. Clark et al, No. 7:2011cv00572 - Document 72 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 09/11/2013. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
NamalRe olc Defns Councl I . 555 U. 7,20 ( t s tr es e e i. nc, S. 2008:. Ea h oft e f fct s c hes our a or mus be s tsi l a 3 t a ifed. d. t 46. Rot r f ist s tf t s ik f c s c e i a mn ri whih s wils f r mtee a l o e orh pec t a t onc m ng ny nne n c he l ufe çre rbl ij r ' wih u t r q e td c u t itr e to M o e v r a t e h a ig t rpaa e n u y' t o t he e u se o r ne v nin. i ro e , t h e rn c onduc e i t s c e on Sep e be 5, 201 a r pr s ntng mor t n 500 pho oc e t d n hi as tm r 3, he e e i e ha t opid e bis a c rs Rountee a fr e t t c tt ts ha pr s nt d a1of he e de xhi t nd ha t, r fim d o he our ha he d e e e 1 r vi nce r ga di t is of e usi ofadmi sr tve r m edis Prs c tons t t c us a e r ng he s ue xha ton nitai e e . ion ondii ha a e n i ae ltga m e e i onve e e or mi dea i o a ni lbr r a es o wrtng nm t ii nt r nc ninc nor ly n bt i ng i a y cc s r ii ma e i l a s r ce ,s h a Rot r e des rbe ,do not rs t t lve of a e e i l t ras nd e vi s uc s mte ci s ie o he e l n xc ptona cr lmsa e wa r ntng t e r or nar r i s r quesshe e. Ass f ist de onsr t icl tnc z a i he xta di y elef he e t r he al o m ta e a lkelhood ofi r r e ha t c tnee no r c t ot r t ee f c or oft W i e ny i i repa abl nn, he our d t ea h he he hr a t s he nt r t t a de eshe moton.An a opra eor wilis t sda es, nd ni r i ppr it der l s ue hi y. The Clr i die t d t s ndco esoft sm e andum opi on a a compa ng ek s rce o e pi hi mor ni nd c nyi or rt pli if de o a ntf. ' ENTER:Thi s '' da ofSe e be ,20 3. * y ptm r . Z ' Unie Stt Diti J t d aes sr udge p . ' ,
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
