-RSB Carty v. Wright et al, No. 7:2011cv00557 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/30/2011. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
G ERK' OFFI U.. ST. S CE S DI COURT AT ROANOKE, VA FI ED L d 32 2 1 2V 21 I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A ' J I DUDL CLERK NI W AQ EX BK 4 ' ROANOKE DI SI N VI O >. . z CH R I C AR TY , S Pl ntf , ai if V. W . W RI T,e al, A. GH t . D ef endants . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C i l c i N o.7: - vvi A t on 11 c 00557 M EM OM NDVM OPI ON NI By:Sam uelG.W is lon U nied St esD i ri Judge t at st ct Pl ntf,Chrs Ca t a Vig ni i t pr e i pr s ,fld t sci lrght a ton ai if i ry, r i a nma e oc ed ng o e ie hi vi i s c i p ru n t 4 U. C.j 1 3. Ca t c mpli t a h wa s be tdt u ra o a l sa c e u s a t o 2 S. 98 ry o ans h t e s u j ce o n e s n b e e rh s a t t he wa s xua l ha as e and a s ule by prs ofk il . Upon r viw of hi nd ha s e ly r s d s a td ion t a s e e s s ison a a t hment,ho ver t c tfndst tCa t hasnote use a la ia e ubm s i nd tac s we , he our i ha ry xha t d 1 val bl a m i sr i r m e es bef e flng t s ac i n, a t r o e t cou t di m i s s hi s t d ni tatve e di or ii hi to nd he ef r , he r s s e s ui wih u p eu iep ru n t 4 U. C. 1 9 ea . t o t rj d c u s a t o 2 S. j 9 7 () 1. The Pr s Lii ton Re or Ac r quies t t i a e e us al a ia e i on tga i f m t e r ha nm t s xha t l va l bl a mi srt e rme is bf r fl g a a to c aln ig p io c n iins 4 U. C.j d nitai e de eo e ii n ci n h le gn rs n o dto . 2 S. v n 1 () seas Di v. e,291F.d485(t Ci.2002) cii Pee v. iconsn De t 997ea ; e lo, xon Pac 3 7h r , tna rz W s i p' ofCo r to ,18 F. 5 535( t Ci.1 )( di t tan i t sco antmus be recins 2 3d 32, 7h r 999 hol ng ha nmae' mpli t di m i s d f f ilr t e us e n i t i a e de o ta es t t he tl d a g i va e a s s e or a lze o xha t ve f he nm t m nsr t ha ie r e nc nd a a e i t t hi he t l ve of t pr s s g i va e pr e e afe co m e i t ppe l d t o he g s e l he i on' r e nc oc dur t r m nc ng he lws t. A dititc tma s s e dimis a c ai whee a prs rs fiur t a ui) src our y ua pont s s ompl nt r ione ' al e o e us i a pa e fom t f ce of t c xha t s p r nt r he a he ompl i . Ande s v.XYZ Coreci l He 1h ant r on r tona at Sevie , F. 674, ( hCi. r c s 407 3d 683 4t r 2005) I t sc e,Caryc de t hei i t pr s . n hi as t once s hat s n he oces of gr evi hi cl m and hi verii s at enti cat t he i cur enty aw aii a res i ng s ai s fed t em ndi es hat s r l tng ponse t hi a a of t de a of hi r gulr gre nc Be us Ca t has not e use al o s ppe l he nil s e a i va e. ca e ry xha t d l a albe a mi itaie rme isbf r tl ti a t n, h c u td s se h ss i wi u v ia l d nsrtv e de eo e ii h s ci t e o r imiss i ut t t ng o ho p eu iefrfiu et e ha s. rj dc o alr o x u t II. Fo t sae r a o s Ca t s c mp an i ds se wih u p eudc p ru n t r he ttd e s n , ry' o lit s imis d t o t rj ie u s a t o j1 ()f f l et e us. 997ea or aiur o xha t E T R: hX T> dyo Noe e,0 1 N E Ti a f vmbr2 1. Ur k:d ae DititJ ts src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
