Clark v. Director of the Department of Corrections, No. 7:2011cv00442 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 09/15/2011. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ci sOFFI ERK' CE U.S. DI COURT SI . ATROANOKE,VA . I qu o sEF 1s 2 1 01 I TH E UN I N TED STATES DI STR I C O U R T CT FOR TH E W E STERN D I STRI T O F V I G I A C R NI R O A N O K E DI SI N VI O JAM ES F.CLARI G ** J A ULI B K t' cu ax zW ' ' j UTY CL ERK CASE NO .7: 11CV00442 Pettone ii r, M EM O R AND U M O PI IO N N VS. DI EC TO R O F TH E D EPA R TM EN T R OF CORRECTI ONS, By: Gl E.Conr en ad C hi fUni e St e D it i Judge e t d at s s r ct R espondent . J m es F. Cl r a V igi a i a e pr ee ng pr K , fl d t s petton f a w rt of a a k, r ni nm t oc di o ie hi ii or i h b a c r us p ru n t 2 U. C.j2 5 c aln ig t e Au u t20 7 j d me to t a e s o p , u s a t o 8 S. 2 4, h le gn h g s 0 u g n f he Pul s Count Cic t Cour unde w hi he s a c c e of m uli e c m t o r pe a a ki y r ui t r ch t nds onvi t d tpl ot s f a nd a bduc i a r l t d c r s a s nt nc d t 3 y r i prs Thi c t sr or i c t s ton nd e a e ha ge nd e e e o 20 ea s n i on. s our ' ec d ndi a e t tClr pr ousy fld a j2254peii co eni t smeconvitons Clr v.Die t , ha ak evi l ie tton nc r ng he a ci , ak r cor Ci lAci No.7:0CV0 6 ( . Va.Se .1 201 ,a a dim' 41 Fe App' 631 vi ton 1 000 W D. pt 3, 0) ppe l s d, 1 d. x a k' r ii s ubs ( 1 2011. Thus,Clr scurentpetton i as equentone, f lngunde t pr biin Feb. 8, )1 ali r he ohi to i 2 U. C. 2 4 b a an tas c n o s c siep tto . n 8 S. j 2 44) g is e o d r uc e sv eiin l hi c r n pl di s Clr c n s ur e t ea ng , a k ompli t tt sae cours e r d i fndi c ti of ans ha he t t t re n i ng eran hi c a m s t be pr dur ly ba r d f om r vi w on t m e is and t tt s c tco pounde s li o oce a l r e r e e he rt ha hi our m d t e r by dim i s ng hi c a m s i Cas N o.7: 0CV 00006 a pr e a l de a t d. H e he r or s si s li n e 1 s oc dur ly f ule c t ndst tt c tm us now a es hi c ai s on t m e is H e i m it ke on e ha he our t ddr s s l m he rt . s s a n. P ru n t j2 4 (9, f d r ldsrc c u t yc n ie as c n o s c e sv j2 5 u s a t o 2 4 1 a e e a itit o r ma o sd r e o d r u c si e 2 4 petton onl upon s fi certfcaton f om t U nied St es CourtofA ppeal f t Fourt ii y peci c ii i r he t at s or he h l Cl k alo pr vi l fl a ci lac i chale ng t valdiy ofhi cont ar s e ousy ied vi ton lngi he i t s inem e on t e nt hes convitons s ngt be alow e t pr entwi es esa c i , eeki o l d o es m s boutt e mater ;t cour c tued and hes t s he t onsr dimis dt sc s a as c si j225 p tto Se Clr v. rcor 7: 1 02 ( . Va. u s se hi a e s uc e sve 4 e iin. e a k Die t , l CV0 74 W D. J ne 1 2 1. 6, 01 ) . , Cic i ta t ecamsi t ep tto me tc ran ciei. j2 4 (9. Be a s Clr h sn t rut h t h li n h eiin e e ti rtra 2 4 1 c u e ak a o obt i d s h c r ii ton by t Co tof Appea s t c tw ildi m i s t pe ii w iho a ne uc e tfca i he ur l , he our l s s he tton t ut p eu iea s c e sv .Ana p o raeo d rwil ne t i d y rj dc s u c sie p r p it r e l e tr hs a . The c er i diec e t s nd co e of t s m e or ndum o ni n a a com pa ng l k s r td o e pi s hi m a pi o nd c nyi or rt pe ii . de o ttoner ENTER:Ths i d yo Se tmb r2011. i 5 a f pe e, . # Chi fUnie St t D i ti tJ e t d a es s rc udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
