Sykes v. Zych et al, No. 7:2011cv00428 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 09/09/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
s OF CEU. DI O URT 1 FI B. SI AT ROAHIKE, A VA 2l. ! =! ': *. ( F8 SEP 29 2 1 . 21 I TH E UNITED STATES DISTR I COU RT N CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRICT O F VI GINI R A RO ANO K E DI SION W TERRANC E SY KES, Pettoner, ii JULI C A BY: D p ,CL ERK CL ERK Ci lActon No.7: v00428 vi i 11c M EM OM NDUM O PI I N N O CH RISTO PH ER ZY CH ,etal, . Respondent s. By:Sam uelG .W is lon Unie St esD it ctJudge t d at s ri PettonerTerance Sykes,a f ali epr ii r eder nmat oceedi pro K ,brngst s acton purs ng i hi i uant t 28U. C.j2 . S scli t tt Unie Sae lc dj idito t prs c t hi o S. 241 yke ams ha he td tts a ke urs cin o o e ue m, hewa d e d poc s,hi sne evi ae d bl jop r hei ataly i c ntb s s enid ue r e s s e tnc olts ou e e ady, s cu l nno e aed o tedo ej o ry a duepoc s vi ai , a dt Bura ofPrs lc da t rt n h ubl e pad nd r e s oltons1 n he e u ions a ke uho iy under l8 U .S. j 3 t c mmi hi a t e c t hi s ne e . Upon r vj w oj t C. 621 o o t m nd o xe u e s e tnc 2 e e . he p tto t c tc nc u st a Syk ha f ie t d mo tae e ilme t r ifund rj e iin, he our o l de h t es s ald o e nsr t ntte nt o ele e 2 a d ta hi peii mus beco tue a d dimisd wi tprj c a as c e sv 241 n h t s tton t nsr d n s se t hou eudie s u c sie mo int va ae, e a i eorc re ts n e e pu s ntt 28U. C.j2 to o c t s t sd o r c e t nc , rua o S. 255. 1 . On M ac 1 200 afe aj r ti i te Wesen DititofNe Yor te c r rh 2, 7, tr uy ral n h tr src w k, h out e ee j me co ci Syk ofposesi wihteitn t diti t 5 grmsormoe ntrd udg nt nvitng es s sng t h ne t o srbue 0 a r ofc ane b e i vi ain of21 U. C.j 8 ()1( 'posesi mor t n 5 ga o oc i as, n olto S. 4lb()A) s sng e ha , rms f c ai ba e i vi a i o 21U. C.j8 s,a b n a f on i pos e so o a tr a m,i oc ne s , n olton f S. 44() nd eig el n s s in f ie r n ' vi a i of1 U. C.j922 g) 1 . Sy sc ale dt lg iy ofhi c vitona s n e c olton 8 S. ( ( ) ke h lnge he e al t s on c i nd e t n e i a moton t v ae s ta ie,o c rc s ntn e p s n t 28 U. C.j 225 fld i t n i o ac t, e sd r ore t e e c urua t o S. 5 ie n he 1 The c r no e t tt de ou t t s ha o monsr t a t ali oc nc , a pe ii ne mus s w f c ua i ce e n me el t ta e c u nn e e tto r t ho a t l nno nc , ot r y he lga i ufi e yofhi co ci orsntnc Bo lvv. ie Stts 523U. 61 6 34( 99 .S sha e l ns fcinc s nviton e e e. use Untd ae , S. 4, 23- 1 8) yke s n de ot monsr t d f t li ce e. ta e acua nno nc 2 Syke pr vi sno ale tonsi s ppor ofhi cl m st tt BOP l c d a t rt t c s o de l ga i n u t s ai ha he a ke u ho iy o omm i hi o e c ehi t m r xe ut s s t nc Ac or ngl hi c a msa e f rt va t wara r lef en e e. c di y, s l i r a oo gue o r nt e i . W es er Di ti of N ew Yor See Unied St es v. Svkes, N o. 6: 6057, 6: 0cv61 t n srct k. t at 05cr 1 72 ( . N. M ar 29,201 .The c r de e hi moton on J nu r 2 2011 Syk a ae W D. Y. . 0) ou t nid s i a a y 4, . es ppe ld and t Unied St t Coul ofAppeal f t Second Cicui deni hi appealon Augus 2, he t a es ' t s or he r t ed s t 201 . Se Sv sv. td Stt s No.1 - l 6 ( Ci. 1. 1 e ke Unie a e , 1 l 0 2d r 201 ) I I. Or na iy, a p tton purua t t 28 U. C. j 225 no 28 U. C. j 22 , i t e di rl e ii s n o S. 5, t S. 41 s h appr i e vehi e f c l ng a conviton ort i poston ofa s ence,3unl a m oton oprat cl or halengi ci he m ii ent i ess pu s a tt j 2 i ti d quae a i fe tve'f rt e pu pos s I r J es 2 F.d r u n o 255 s cna e t nd nef ci ' o hos r e . n e on , 26 3 328 33 3 ( t Ci.200 . A pe iin pu s n t j 2255 i ûna q t a i fe tve't , 3- 4 4 h r 0) tto rua t o s û de uae nd ne fc i ' o i c le t e i iin ofa s n e c onl whe ( )s tld 1w e tbls d t lgaiy o t e ha lnge h mposto e t n e y n 1 ete a sa ihe he e lt f h c cin o s ntnc a t tme i os d;( )a trt prs rha c ee hi a e a onvito r e e e t he i mp e 2 fe he ione s omplt d s pp al nd frtj225 mo i ac ngei s t n ie lw r nd r t c duc f whih t e p io rwa is 5 ton, ha n ubsa tv a e e s he on t or c h rs ne s c nvit d n l rc i na;a ( )t prs e c nno s tsyt g t k pi pr sonsofj o ce o onge rmi l nd 3 he ion r a t aif he a e ee ng ovii 2255 becaus t new r e i notone ofcons iutonall m ade r r tvel applcabl t cas e he ul s tt i aw etoac i y i e o es on colat ralr ew. 1 Sykes' petton does noti cat any r pecti whi hi cas m ee s l e evi d. s ii ndi e es n ch s e t t sa da dunde l r J ss a t quaiy frc nsde ai u rj2 . Cl ry t r h he t n r r n e one o s o lf o o i r ton nde 241 ea l he e as been no change i t l m aki i now l t poss s cocai bas orpos es a fr m as a n he aw ng t egal o es ne e s s iear convi ed f on. Accor ngl t courtfndst tSykesf l t m ee t l r J ct el di y, he i ha ais o t he n e oness a d t t ndar o s w t tj 2255 i i de ua et t s t l aiy ofh sc viton,a hi cai ca tb ho ha s na q t o e t he eg lt i on c i nd s l ms nno e 4 a ese u rj22 . ddr s d nde 41 3 S eUntdSae v Lit , 9 F.d6 1(t Ci. 0 4 (ç 1atc o tee euino ()sne c adn t e i tts . tl 3 2 3 7 4h r2 0 ) 1An t k n h x c t f a e tn e n o a e e ( a o c l trl t c o (jc n it n . . iqp o el b o g t n e 2 U. C. j2 419 .t h b a p tt nu d rj ol e a at k n a o v ci . (s r p ry ru h u d r 8 S. A. 2 .) E a e s ei o n e a a o 5 A i 2 mut h ve ,b fld i t dititi whiht p io ri c i d.'l r J s 2 F. 328,3 ( h 241 s, owe r e ie n he src n c he rs ne s onfne ' n e one, 26 3d 32 4t 4 r2 0 ) ctn 8 S. j 2 (). Ci. 0 0 (iij2 U. C. 2 41a) Th c ur d lne t c tu Syk 'peii asa j2 5 moin. Fis,j225 motonsmus beb ou ti te e o t ecl s o onsr e es tton 25 to rt 5 i t r gh n h c r whi i os d te s nen e. Se 28 U. C.j22 ,s as Swai v.Prs lv,43 U. 3 378( 97 . ou t ch mp e h e t c e S. 55* ee lo n e se 0 S. 72, 1 7) 2 1 . 11 Fo t raonssae h ri t c t s se S s peii wihou prjdie. r he e s ttd een,he ourdimiss yke ' tton t t eu c The Cl k i diec ed t s er s r t o end a ceriied copy of t s M em or tt hi andum Opi on and ni accompanyi Or rt pettoner ng de o ii . ENTER: i b d yo S pe e, 01 . Ths a f e tmbr2 1 fnie SttsDititJ e td ae src udg Se nd,S h ara fld aj22 moin i t W etr DititofNe Yo k. l or rt fl as c s i co ykes as le dy ie 55 to n he sen src w r n de o ie uc e sve j2 5 moini tedsrc c uth mu trc iepefl ja to iainfo tea po raec uto a g as 2 5 t n h itit o r, e s eev r-in uh rzto rm h p rpit o r f p el. o i Se j225 h) Si eSyke ha no de tae t tt UnledStt Cou to Ap al f rteSec dCic tha e 5( . nc s s t monsrtd ha he t aes r f pe s o h on rul s is d hi p eflng a h i ton t s ta sc ors c si j 2255 moi t dititc r h no sue m r -ii utorzai o ubmi e ond u ce sve ton, he src ou t as j rs ito t c n i e te meiso hs j 2 5 cams Ac o dn l,te c u td e n tfn t a ta se o a u idcin o o sd r h r f i 2 5 li . c r i gy h o r o s o i d h t rn f r f t ce ry s c e sv j 2 5 mo in t te s ne cn c u tf rh r t e itr sso j sie o j d ca e o o . la l u c s ie 2 5 to o h e tn ig o r u te s h n eet f u t r u iil c n my c The e or t sc tde lnest c tue a ta f rSyke 'p tton. r f e, hi our c i o onsr nd r nse s e ii 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.