Ramsey v. City Of Martinsville et al, No. 7:2011cv00370 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 08/05/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
cuERK' ArFl u. . < e l s oF c: s DI x r > VI E. LL VA Eo C I TH E U N I N TED STA TES DI STR I C O UR T CT FO R TH E W E STE RN D I STR I T O F VI G I I C R N A RO AN O K E DIVISIO N C LA YT O N W .R AM SEY , Pl nt f , ai i f V. CITY O F M A R TIN SV ILL E,etal, . D ef endant . s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) qn . A% -5 221 J A ULI BY; D ' , % EP Ci lA ct on N o.7: cvvi i 11- 00370 M EM O R AN DU M O PI IO N N By: H on.Jac on L.K ie ks sr Seni U nied St esD i t ctJudge or t at s ri Cl on W .Ram sey,a V i gi a i at proceedi pr K ,f l d a c vi r gh s c pl i ayt r ni nm e ng o ie i l i t om a nt . pu s n t 42U. C. 1 8 wi j rs ito vetd i 2 U. C. 1 4 .Plitf n me a rua t o S. j 9 3 t u id ci n se n 8 S. j 3 3 anif a s s h dee t t CiyofM a tns lea t M a tns leCiyJ i (tal'.Pl ntf c ans fndans he t ri vil nb he ri vil t al dJ i' ai if ompli ) t Jai t eat a gr of i at m or f hat l r s oup nm es e avorabl t ot s and pr ded i tci m edi y han her ovi nsufi ent cal cae.Thi matri befr mef s reni purua t 28U. C.j 1 5A.Afe rviwi r s te s o e or ce ng, s nt o S. 91 tr e e ng plitf ss b si n , dimistec mplitwi o tp eu c frfii t saeacam u o an if u miso s l s s h o an t u rj die o al o tt li p n h ng w hi r le m a be gr nt ch e i f y a ed. Im us di m i s a a ton or c ai t l d by a i a e i lde e m i t tt a ton or t s s ny c i l m ie n nm t f t r ne ha he c i cl m i f i ous orf l t s a e a cl i on w hi h r i m a be g ant Se 28 U . C. ai s rvol ais o t t am c elef y r ed. e S. jj1 e)2) 1 5A( ( ) 42U. C.j 1 () Thetrtsa r i l camsbasd 915( ( , 91 b)1 ' , S. 997ec . is tndad ncudes li e uponûa i s a y me its lgalt l 'C l msofi rnge ntofalga i ee twhih ûn ndiputbl rte s e heoy' l ai c nfi me e l ntrs c c e ry doesnote s ,' c a m sw her t k a t lcon e i a e c e ry bas l s' N e t ke v. lal xit' or l i e he ' c ua f t ntons r l a l e es . ' iz W ila ,490U. 31 327( 989) Thescondsa r i t fmiirsa r f amoi t lims S. 9, 1 . e tndad s he a la tndad or ton o dimisunde Fe r lRul ofCi lPr e e 1 b)6) a ce i t pl ntf' fcua s s r de a e vi oc dur 2( ( , c ptng he ai ifs a t l alegatonsast l i rue. A com pl ntneeds ta shol and pl n s at entoft cl m show i t t ai G ' t ai t em he ai ng hat he pl de i e il t r if' nds fce Egjcua al tons...t r iearghtt rle a ea r s ntted o ele a ufiintdfa t l legai o as i o eif bove < t es e ultv lv l. .' Bel l Cop. Two l, 5 U. 5 4 5 5( 0 )(nena h p c aie e e . . l At. r v. mby 5 0 S. 4 , 5 20 7 itr l ' quoai mar omit .A pl ntf' ba i f r le Se rsmor t lbesa tton ks ted) ai ifs ss or eift quie r e han a l nd c us ons ....' 1 The ef r ,t pl ntf m us t l ge f c s s f c e t s a e a lt oncl i ' d. r o e he ai i f t s e a t uf i i nt o t t l he al ee nt ofEhe cai ' Bas v. lDupontd Ne lme s t ) l m. ' s E.. e mour & Co.32 F.d 761 765( hCi. s , 4 3 , 4t r 2003) . H o e r de e m i ng w he hera c pl i ts a e a pl us bl c a m f r le i ta w ve , t r ni t om a n t t s a i e l i or e i f s ç c n e ts e ii ts t a rq rst r ve ngc u t od a o is u iile p re c a d o tx-p cfc a k h t e uie he e iwi o r t r w n t j d ca x e in e n com m on sense.' Ashcrof v.l , ' t qbal - U. S. - , 1 S. .1 1 ( a 18, 09) Thus a 29 Ct 937, 950 M y 20 . , c tsr e ngac ai unde Rul 1 b)6)c n i ntf pladi t ta enote ttedt a our c e ni ompl nt r e 2( ( a de iy e ngs ha r nil o n a s i oftuh be us t yc itofnomor t n lbel a concusons J SAlho hI sumpton r t ca e he onss e ha a s nd l i . . t ug / lberlyc tuepr â c ai s Hanesv. r r 404U. 51 520- ( 972) ldono a t i al onsr o q ompl nt, i Kene , S. 9, 21 1 , tc a t i a e' a s he nm t s dvoc t s s a e, ua pont de opi s a u or a co tt i lc a m s t i a e e vel ng t t t y nd ns iutona l i he nm t f ldt cla l rieont fc ofhi c an. Se Br kv.Car l 1 F. 241, ( h aie o e ry as he a e s omplit e oc rol, 07 3d 243 4t Ci.1 ( tg, ,conc rng) Bea t v.CiyofHa on,775F. 1 4,1 (t Ci. r 997) Luti J. uri ; udet t mpt 2d 27 278 4h r 1 ) Seeas Gor n v.Le ke 574F. 11 11 ( hCi.1 )(ec zi t tditit 985 . lo do e , 2d 47, 51 4t r 978 r ogni ng ha src co t a e no e urs r t xpec ed t a s e t r e ofa t o s um he ol dvoc t f t pr > p an ig. a e or he o q litf . . Tosaeacli unde jl apli ifmus algeûhevi ai ofargh s c e by tt am r 983, antf t le t olton t i t e urd t Cons iuton a l w s oft U nie St t , nd m us s he tt i nd a he t d a es a t how t tt a l ge de i ton w a ha he le d prva i s c ommit b ape s aci unde col ofsaelw. W es v.At ns 48 U. 42,48( 988) ted y ron tng r or tt a ' ' t ki , 7 S. 1 . Ho v rplitf fist nn ap ro s be t ola iiyvaj1 8 b c u eh na st J i we e , anif al o me e s n u j c t ib l i 9 3 e a s e me he al t as def endantand faist lnk a Jai polcy t t Ciy of M ari vil See M ccov v.Chesa l oi l i o he t tns le. peake Con.Ct.788F.Supp. ( D. Am .l3,1 (ea o ngj isax no1a omit . r, 890 E. Va. 992) r s ni al l ppr at 2 deenda st aj 1 3aci .Se as W ilv.M ihi nDe to Stt Polc 491U. 58,70 f nt o 98 ton) e lo l c ga p' f ae ie, S. ( 989) M onelv. p'ofSoc.Sevs,436U. 658( 978 ;Sti e v.W ae s 989F. 1 1 , . l De t r . S. 1 ) rcklr tr, 2d 375, 1 ( h Ci.1 ) Ac or ngl pl ntf prs ntyf ist saeacli uponwhihrle may 390 4t r 993 . c di y, ai if e e l al o tt am c eif b ga td, n 1ds s hi c mpli t t o tp eudc , r u n t 2 U. C. l 5 b () e rn e a d imis s o an wih u rj ie pu s a t o 8 S. j 91 A()1 . Pl ntf m a r f l hi c a m s a t tm e ofhi c c ai i f y e ie s l i t he i s hoi e. The Cl r i di e t d t s nd c e oft sm e or e k s r c e o e opi s hi m andum opi on a t a om pa ng ni nd he cc nyi or t t pl i i f der o he a ntf . ENTER : Thi day ofAug t 2011 us , . Se or nie St es Di t i tJ e ni t d at sr c udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.