McClanahan v. Crouse, No. 7:2011cv00297 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 08/01/2011. (kab)

Download PDF

Å enx' oFFl u. . sm cour s ce s ol AT I NM LL vA M E, I TH E U N I ED STA TE S D I U CT C O UR T N T STI F I F T WE T RNDIT C OFVRGI A OR HE S E S RIT I NI A c- jl qg ROANOKE DI SI VI ON M IC H A EL AN TH O N Y M C CLA N AH AN , Pl ntif ai f , J AcD UL BK , cÅ D P TYc E Ci lA ct on No.7: c 00297 vi i 11- v- M EM O RANDUM OPI ON NI LA RR Y CR O U SE, D ef endant . By: H on.Jacks L.l sÃ§r on 'fi Sc or Uni e St e D i t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c By Or re e ed J y 5,201 t c ta s s d a $350. tlng f e a gr nt d de nt r ul 1, he our s es e 00 ii e nd a e pl ntf ffee da fom t da eoft Or rt f war t t c tasa e e ofhi as es ai if it n ys r he t he de o or d o he our tt m nt s st a ar tr r ng hi tus a c nd epor ega di s r t c ountf t sx m ont prort J ne2011 sgne by ea h or he i hs i o u ,i d c a opr a e pr s of i a whe e pl i ifw a c i d d i t ttm e s t c tc d ppr i t i on fci l r a ntf s onfne ur ng ha i o he our oul de er i a pa e s he e.Pl i i fw asa s t tf iur t r t ' t r r d t m ne ym nt c dul a ntf dvi ed ha a l e o e ut he equie n p p m o kwo dr s l i d s sa o ti a o wih u p eudc . a e r ul e ut n imis l f h s din t o t rj ie Pl i iff l d ce tte i a e ac untr por soft s x- ont pe i prort J y,not a ntf ie r ii d nm t co e t he i m h r od i o ul t sxhe i mont pe i prort J 2011.The e o e pl ntf di notc h rod i o une r f r , ai if d ompl wih t c tona y t he ondii l fl go d r d s t tewa nn t a h sa to ma b ds se wih u p eu ief r ii r e , epi h r ig h t i cin y e imis d t o t rj dc o n e nonc m pla e,a t co tc o i nc nd he ur anno de e net a opra eflng f e a s s t purua tt t t nni he ppr it ii e s es men , s n o 28U. C.j 1 5() Ac r ngl t sacinmus bedimis wihoutprj c f plitf s S. 91 a . co di y,hi to t s sed t eudie or anif fiur t payt flngfeorpr rydoc nthi a iai t pr ee L f r pa rs al e o he ii e ope l ume s pple ton o oc d q oma upei a trt c tsor r Pl i ifm a r fl t c fe he our ' de . antf y e ie he ompli a ane a s r t a to a t tme ant s w nd epa a e c in t he i hec npayt $35 flngfeo fl t nec s r doc nt t pr edk f mapa rs a he 0 ii e r ie he esay ume s o oce q or upei . The Cl r i diec ed t s nd a c oft sor rt pl i if ek s r t o e opy hi de o a ntf . EN TER : Thi s day ofA ugus ,2011. t ; e' # Se orUnied St es Di t i Judge t at s rct

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.