Barbour v. Mullins et al, No. 7:2011cv00268 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 06/15/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
Qk :RK:OFFI U.. ST. CE S DI COURT AT RoANoc , A V FI ED L I TH E U N I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O UR T CT FO R TH E W EST ER N DI STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A RO AN O K E DI SI N VI O J 15 2 1 UN 21 C ULW C. D RX D K EN N ETH EDW A RD BA R BO U R , Pl ntf ai if, C i lActon N o.7: cvvi i 11- 00268 V. M EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI M ULL I S,etaI, N . D efendant s. By:H on.Jam es C .T urk Seni U ni ed St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct Pl i ifK e t Ba bo ,a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr K ,fl d a ci lr ght a ntf nne h r ur r ni nm t oce di o ie vi i s c mplitpu s a tt 4 U. C. 1 8 wi u idcinv se i 28U. C. 1 4 Plitf o an , ru n o 2 S. j 9 3 t rs ito e td n hj S. j 3 3. anif di nots i pa e f rt $350 flng f ewih hi c d ubm t ym nt o he ii e t s ompl i buttl tna a doc nt ant ied i ncil ume s is n uppor ofar que tt pr ee t fnnapa pei.See28U. C.jj 1 4() 1915.Pl nif t e s o oc d q o u rs S. 91 a , aitf had a l s t ee non- be s c vi c pl i sora t ea t hr ha a i l om a nt ppea spr vi l di m i s d asf i ous o f l e ous y s s e r vol r or f lngt sae ac am upon whi h r le m a beg a e aii o t t l i c e if y r ntd.Se e. ,Ba bourv. r i aDe . e, :. r Vic ni pt of Co .e a.7: c 00091( . Va. . 2009) Babourv.Stnf d.e a.7: c 00077 n' t 1, 09-v. W D. Apr 8, . , r a or t 1, 09-v( . Va. .7,2009) Babourv. r ni De .ofCor,7: c 00083( . Va Apr 6, W D. Apr , . r Vici a pt r. 09-vW D. . . 2009 . ) l a or nc wiht t eesrkespr so of28U. C.j1 ( ,hec t n cc da e t he hr -ti oviin S. 915g) t our pr vi l a s pli ift thene de t s i t $350. tlng f oresa ih a e ousy dvied a ntf ha e d o ubm t he 00 ii ee t bls n i m i ntt e tofs r o ph i lha m t pr e d w ih a c vi s t e, c. Ba bourv. m ne hr a e i us ysca r o oc e t i l ui .Se e. , r Ke fe Commisre a VDOC', 7: c 001 ( . Va M a 1 2009) Afe efe sais t s No. 09-v- 54 W D. . y 2, . tr r vi w i pl i ifs s i s onsi t s c vi a ton,i i c e t tpl ntf doesnotaleg a e e ng a ntf ubm s i n hi i l c i t s l ar ha ai if l e ny fcsi cai t thei c rntyunde a i ne t e ofa s rousphysca ij y a t ndi tng ha s ure l r ny mmi nt hrat ny ei i ln ur wihi t me ni of28U. C.j1 5( .Baedo t f eg nga t c ai ,hec r t n he a ng S. 91 g) s n he or oi nd he ompl ntt ou t tndst tpl ntf ha f ied t de ons r t a i m i ntda rof s r ous phys c lha i t i ha ai if s a l o m t a e ny m ne nge ei i a nn n he CLERK c ompl i a pli ifha notpad t $350. flng f edes t beng pr ousy a s d of ant nd a ntf s i he 00 ii e pie i evi l dvie ha ngt eesrkes Ac di y,hecour de e pli ifsi i motont pr e L f ma vi hr ti . cor ngl t t nis antf mpled i o oce d q or p u ei a dd s s e tec mplit t o t rj d c f rf i r t p yt fln fea tetme a p rs n imis s h o an wih u p eu ie o al e o a he iig e th i u offlngt co ai .See e. ,Dupr v. l r 284F. 123 1237( t Ci.2002) ii he mpl nt , c. ee Pame, 3d 4, 11h r (e s nn t tt fln f ei d eu nfln acvia to wh nj f r p u e i p o so ra o ig ha he iig e s u po iig i l cin e . o ma a p rs r viins q do nota yt pl ntf a t tt c 'i notr r d t pe mi pl i ifa o runiyt pay ppl o ai if nd ha he eul s t equie o r t antf n ppo t t o t flngfea trde nglavet pr e t f mapa rs.M orove ,t c tc riist t he ii e fe nyi e o oc ed q or upei) e r he our e tfe ha ana a oft sor rwoul notbet ni goodfih,purua t 28U. C.j 1 5()3) ppe l hi de d ake n at s nt o S. 91 a( . The Cl r i diec ed t s nd c esoft sm e or nd opi on a t ac om pa yi e k s r t o e opi hi m a um ni nd he c n ng or ert t pl i tf . d o he a n if ENTER:Thi /F X s d yo Jne 2 1 a f u , 01 . Se or nie St t s D it i t dg ni t d a e s rc e 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.