Douglas v. Johnson et al, No. 7:2011cv00250 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 09/12/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
CLERKY OFFI t, Dl COURT CE )S. SI AT M NVILE. L VA sr, o )o E'1 1 gg P l I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I T O F V I G I A C R NI RO AN O K E DI I O N V SI J UL , u CLERK BY: # DE LE LAM O N T 0 .DO UG LA S, Pl ntf ai if, C i lA c i N o.7: - vvi ton 11 c 00250 V. M EM O R AND UM O PI I N N O GENE JO HNSON,e al, t . By: D ef endant s. Hon.Jact on L.Ki e ls sr Se o U ni e St t sD i t c Judge ni r t d a e s ri t By Or ren e e J 6,2011 t c tas e s d a $350. tlng f a gr ntd de t r d une , he our s s e 00 ii ee nd a e Pli ifffe n da fom t dae oft Or rt f r 'dt t c tas ae e ofhi a s t antf ite ys r he t he de o o wa o he our t tm nt r s ses a a r por r ga di hi tus a ountf rt sx m o hsprort M ay 2011,1s gnedby e c nd e t e r ng s r t cc o he i nt i o i ah ap o it prs ofi i lwhe epl i ifwa c i d durng t ttm es t c tc d pr pra e ion fc a r antf s ontne i ha i o he our oul d t r i a pa e s dul Pl ntf wasadvi e t tf l e t r t n t r uie e e m ne ym nt che e. ai if s d ha aiur o e ur he eq r d pa ewo kwo drs l i ds sa o ti a to wih u p eu ie p r r ul e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t rj d c . Pl i iftl d ce tfed i ae a ountr po t oft sx- ont pe i prort J 201 , antf ie rii nm t cc e rs he i m h rod i o une 1 no t sxt he i mont pe i prort M a 2011 The ef e pl i ifdi notcompl wih t h rod i o y . r or , antf d y t he c n i o a fl o d r depietewa nn ta h sa t n ma b ds se wi o t rj d c o dt n l ii r e , s t h r ig h t i ci i ng o y e imis d t u p eu ie h f ' olnonco pla e,a Ic nno de e m i t a opr a e flng f e a s s m e ,pur ua t 28 m i nc nd a t t r ne he ppr i t ii e s e s nt s nt o U. C. 1 5 a .Ac o dngy t sa to mus beds se wih u prj diefrplitf s S. j 91 () c r i l,hi cin t imis d t o t eu c o an if fiur t pa t tlngf orpr rydoc nthi a iai t pr ee t f mapa rs al e o y he ii ee opel ume s pplc ton o oc d q or upe i a t rt c tsor . Pli ifma r fl hi c am si ane a s pa a eac i a t tmehe fe he our' der a ntf y e ie s l i n w nd e r t ton t he i c npayt $ flngfeorfl t ne sa ydoc a he 350 ii e ie he ce sr umenst pr e L f mapa rs t o oce d q or upei. lPl ntf ave st thede iedhi com pli i ot prs si tt ina m al x on J l 20ll. Howe , ai if r ha post s ant nt he ion' nsiuto l ibo une , ver t e o ssa p- ei cl ryM a 3l 20ll a pl ntf sgne ot rvarouspa si ude wih t he nvelpe' tm dat s ea l y , , nd ai ifs i d he i per ncl d t he compl nton M a 28,2011 Furher or t c tr ei t compl nton J l 20l1 a t c tdoe no ai y . t m e, he our ec ved he ai une , , nd he our s t r ceves m e da rgul UniedSttsPosalM alfom pl ntf prs Acc di y, lc i rt Com pl nt e i a - y e ar t ae t ir ai ifs ion. or ngl onsde he ai fld i M a 2011 notJ 20l1.SeeHouson v.La k, U .S. 6 2 6( 98 )( e c ii gp io - ib xr l) ie n y , une t c 487 2 6, 7 1 8 d s rb n rs n mal o ue . Thus t pr cedi sx- ont pe i bef epl ntf fldt Com pli w a bewee November20l a Aprl , he e ng i m h rod or ai if ie he ant s t n 0 nd i 2011 . The C l r i die ed t s nd a c oft sM e or ndum Opi on a t a om pa i e k s r ct o e opy hi m a ni nd he cc ny ng Or rt pl ntf . de o ai if E T R Ti1 <' dy fet e 21. NE: h s aoSpmbr 01 e , * Se rUnied St t sDititJ ge ni t a e src u

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.