Meredith v. Berry, No. 7:2011cv00248 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 06/02/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
a n /sOFFI U. . sT. tr CE : DI K J AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L JUN 22 2 1 21 I T H E U N I D STATES DI N TE STR I T C O U R T C FO R T H E W E STER N D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI JO N A H JUN I R M E R ED I 1 1 O TH 1 , J A C 7'r /CLERK ULI '1 BY; DE W CL ERK CA SE NO .7: 11CV 00248 Pettoner, ii M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O VS. W. THOM AS BERI , K , W c By:Sa e G. is n mu l W lo U nie St t sD i t i tJudge t d a e s rc R es pondent . J h J orM e edih 11 a Vigi a i ae pr e ng pr K ,tld t spe ii f r a ona uni r t 1, r ni nm t oc edi o ie hi tton o wrt ofha s c i bea omus purua t 28 U. C.j2254,c le ng hi c i me unde t s nt o S. halngi s onfne nt r he Oco e 2 0 j g n o t Nes n Co ny Cic i Co r c n itn h m o f r ey a d tb r 01 ud me t f he lo u t rut u q o v cig i f o g r n ute i a s t nci hi t fve ye r i pr s e t Bec us i i c e r f om t f ce ofhi t rng nd en e ng m o i a s m i onm n . a e t s l a r he a s pe ii t the ha notye e tton ha s t xhause sa e c tr di s t cou tc udest t pe ii n t d tt our eme e , he r oncl hat he tto m us bes ma iy dimi s d. t um rl s s e M e edih sa e t the wass nt nc d i t sa e c ton Oc obe 27,201 a t thi r t t t s ha e e e n he tt our t r 0 nd ha s a alt t Co tof A ppe s of V igi a w as de e on M a 1 2011 H e s a e t the di ppe o he ur al r ni ni d y 6, . t t s ha d nott n s e f t rr viw by ahi rsa eco q s h a t Supr me Cour ofVigi a,a he e k urhe e e ghe t t ur uc s he e t r ni nd di notfl a sa e pe ii f awrtofha asc usco e ni t c l d co ci ns d ie ny tt tton or i be om nc r ng he halenge nvi to . Healeg t thi a t ne s dha c l es ha s tor y houl ve onduc e a to lpr ti i tgai a asr if t d ddii na e ral nvesi ton, nd ele , he s eksa a ala a nt e tofne c e n ppe nd ppoi m n w ouns l e. Under28 U. C.5 225 1 a f erlcou tc nnotgrnta ha aspeii u es t S. 4(8, ed a r a a be tton nl s he pe ii r ha e used t r m e es a ia e i t c t of t sa e i whih he was ttone s xha t he e di val bl n he ours he t t n c co c ed. The e usi r quiem e i s tsi d by s e ng r vi w oft c a m i t hi hes nvi t xha ton e r nt s a i te e ki e e he l i n he g t saec u twihj rs ito t c n ie te cam. S e O' ulv n v.Bo rk l 5 6 U. 8 8 tt o r t u id ci n o o sd r h li e S lia ec e , 2 S. 3 (1 99) 9 . Ia t ppea s f o M e e t s s i s ons t the c d s ilf l a tm el a r rm r dih' ubm s i ha oul t l ie i y ppea f om t lr he Co r o Ap e l j d me tt te S p e Co r o Vigni,h h g s c u tnt esae S e u t f p as u g n o h u rme u t f r i a te ihet o r i h tt. e Va CodeAnn.j8. - ( (e rng peii f a a t be tl wihi t ry da atr . 01671 C) r quii tton or ppe l o ied t n hit ys fe daeofCour ofAppe l de son) Ori hewihe t brngonl cai ofi feci a ssa e t t as cii . f s so i y l ms nef tve s itnc ofco el he c d fl a habe peii i t Su eme Cour ofVigi a. Se Va.CodeAnn. uns , oul ie as tton n he pr t r ni e 1 8. - a( ) Be aus he hasa ia e sae cou trmedis t cour c ude t thi 01654()1 . c e valbl tt r e e , he t oncl s ha s j2 4peiin mus b d s s e wih u prj d c , u s a tt Rul 4ofteRu e Go e nn 25 t o t t e imis d t o t eu ie p ru n o e h ls v r ig s al e o us l e t e eme es j225 Casslba e on hi f iur t exha tavaiabl sat courtr di Se Slvt v. 4 e, sd e a on . Sm ih, 404U. 53( 971.Ana opraeor rwi is t sda 2 t S. 1 ) ppr it de l sue hi y. l The Cl r i die t d t s nd co e oft s me o a ek s rce o e pi s hi m r ndum o ni a a o pa ng pi on nd cc m nyi or rt pettone . de o ii r ENTER:Thi A' s .' da ofJ , 20ll. y une ' ' , U 'ed a esD i t i tJ t sr c udge 1 Pt smntt Rul 4, h c ul ma s mma i dim isaj225 peiin wh r ltpli y l l o e t e o ' y u rl s s r t y 4 tto e e ç anl i appear f om t f oft petton and any a xed e bis't tpettoneri notentted t r i . s r he ace he ii nne xhi t' ha ii s il o elef 2 M er t m a r ie hi f der habeaspetton i he i siluns edih y efl s e al ii f s tl ucces f i obt ni r i s ul n ai ng elef a e pr e i hi cli t t S r meCo t Vigi aa d rc i ngar ig fo t tc ur. ftr esntng s ams o he up e ur of r ni n e evi uln r m ha o t

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.