Lawhorn v. Ayers et al, No. 7:2011cv00114 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 6/28/2011. (tvt)

Download PDF
C EM S oF ce U. Dl cÅ Rr Fl s. sm ATM K E. VA F I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI I A CT RG NI R OANOKE DI VISI ON GLENN CALVI LAW H O RN,JR. N , Pl ntf ai if, L. A Y ERS,etaI, J. . D ef nda s e nt . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) D J Ut BK . EM Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00114 DE vi t on 11- vP M EM OM NPUM O PI NION By:H on.Jackson L.K i er s Seni U ni ed St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct Pl i ifG l nn Ca vi La ho n, r,a V igi a i a e pr ee ng pr K ,fl d acvi a ntf e l n w r J. r ni nm t oc di o ie i l . rg t c mp an , u s a tt 4 U. C. 1 8 wi u idcinv se i 2 U. C. 1 4 ihs o lit p ru n o 2 S. j 9 3 t rs ito e td n 8 S. j 3 3. hj Pli ifdi notpa t $350flngfewihhi c ant Se 28U. C.j 1 l a .Pli if antf d y he ii e t s ompli . e S. 9 4() antf ha a l as t e non- bea c vi co pl i sora d t e t hr e ha s i l m a nt ppea s pr vi l di m i s d a f i ous orf l e ous y s s e s r vol or f ii t sa ea cai upon whih r le ma begr nt d. Se La r v.Anaeon,e a .No. alng o tt l m c ei f y a e e who n l t l, 98- (t Ci. un.1 l ( de de yi pli ifla t pr e on a a vi t 6448 4h r J 2, 998) or r n ng antf e ve o oce d. ppe l a he , * PLRA a r rngpl ntf t pa t a flngfe . nd equii ai if o y otl ii e ) Afe r e ngpli ifss t r eviwi a ntf ubmi sonsi t sevi a ton,i i cea t tpl i ifdo s i n hi i l ci t s l r ha antf es notal a f c si c tng t the i c r nty unde a y i i tt e to a y s ro lege ny a t ndi a i ha s ure l r n mm nen hr a f n e ius ph ia ij ywihi t mea ngof28U. C.j 1 5( .Ba e ont f eg nga t ysc l nur t n he ni S. 91 g) s d he or oi nd he c ompli t lfnd t tpli iff l t de a n , i ha antf ais o monsr t a i mi ntda rofs rousphysc ha m ta e ny m ne nge ei ial r it c n he ompl i a di notpai t $350. flng f edes t bei pr ousy a s of ant nd d d he 00 i e pie ng evi l dvied havi t eesrke .Se 28U. C.j1 4() Ac r ngl ldimist c an wihout ng hr ti s e S. 91 a . codi y, s s he omplit t prj c f f ii t pa t flngfea t tmeofflngt c ant eudie or alng o y he ii e t he i ii he ompli . The Cl r i diecedt s nd co e oft sm e a um opi on a t a c ek s r t o e pis hi mor nd ni nd he c ompan ng yi o de t t pl ntf . r r o he ai if EN TER : Thi soov - JUN 2' 2 1 3 01 =Z da ofJ ,2011 y une . Se o Unie St t D i ti tJ r t d a es sr c udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.