-RSB Valentine v. Roanoke County Police Department et al, No. 7:2010cv00429 - Document 33 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 01/06/2012. (kab)

Download PDF
CL S oFFl u.s. sm eour ERK' c: Dl A nANVIkex T L VA Ft o-. ln f oc I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRI T O F VI G I I C R N A RO AN O KE DIVI N SIO J 2s 2 1 A8 22 JULI c. A DuD> CLERK B ; * CLERK Y PUTY 4. BRY AN JAM ES VA LENTI E, N Pl ntf , ai if Ci lActon N o.7: cvvi i 10- 00429 M EM O R ANDU M O PINIO N RO AN OK E CO UN TY PO LICE, DEPARTM EN T,etal, . Def endant . s By: H on.Jacks L.K i on ser Seni Unied St esD it ctJudge or t at s ri Thi m ateri bef e m e upon pl ntf sr pons t t courtsN ovem ber23,2011 Or s t s or ai if' es e o he ' , der dieci hi t fl a Ame d Compl n f t s42U. C.j 1 cvi rgh sa to Pl ntf r tng m o ie n nde ait or hi S. 983 i l i t c in. ai if rq ssi hi rs ons tathi a tonbedimisdwihou prj c be a ehec nnotc mplt e ue t n s e p e h t s ci s se t t eudie c us a o ee hi dicover orA m ended Com pl ntw hie he i i cer t s s y ai l s ncar a ed. Fe rlRul ofCi lPr e e41a( pemisplitf t vol trl dimist sa ton dea e vi oc dur ()2) r t anif o unaiy s s hi ci o yb ac ur or rb c edee a sara yfldt iAns r Def da sha no obe tdt nl y o t de e aus fnd nt le d ie her we . en nt ve t jce o pli ifsrqu ta t p riswilno be( ail prj c d. Se PhilpsUSA.I ,v. llx antf' e es, nd he a te l t û ry eudie ' e li unf ' nc. Alfe USA.lc.7 F. 35 358( 0hCi.l 6)( susigfcor t c i rwhe dimisnga ton n , 7 3d 4, 1 t r 99 dic sn a t s o onsde n s si ci purua tt Fe R.Ci P. ()2) Da sv. s n o d. v. 41a(); vi USX Cor ,81 F. 1 1 ( hCi.1 ) p. 9 2d 270, 273 4t r 987 (a ) Thedoc trve l ta t sa tonh n pr rse v r fr a dee nt ha no ye sme. ke e as h thi ci as ot oge sd ey a, nd fnda s ve t t expended s t i efors t r pond t t sacton. Furt m or any excessve del orl of ubsantal f t o es o hi i her e, i ay ack dii lgence i pros i t sacton i a ti abl t pl ntf . A ccor ngl lgr pl ntf s r n ecutng hi i s trbut e o ai if di y, ant ai if eques t f vol tr dimis lwih tprj c a det a moo a yousa ngmoins. or unay s sa tou eudie nd t s t n ttndi y to The Clrk i diec ed t se cerii copi oft sM em or e s r t o nd tf ed es hi andum Opi on and t ni he accom pa ng O r t pl ntf a couns ofr d f def nyi der o ai if nd el ecor or endant . s ENTER :Ths &+ G d yo Jn ay 2 2. i a f au r, 01 Se i Unied St esD1 titJudge or t at rc

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.