Olsen v. Angelone, No. 7:2001cv00310 - Document 82 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/13/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
r FRKSOF IEt.. s rnlr a ' FC i Dlm . l s ATRoAs k, ox vA Fl Eo L' I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRI OF VI NI CT RGI A RO ANOK E DI SI W ON H ENRY CH RI AN OLSEN , STI OCT 13 2 1 07 JULA C. I . E. CL BY; CASE NO .7: 01CV00310 ' D L Pe ii ner tto , M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI R O N ALD A AN G EL O N E, By: H on.G l n E.C onrad e Unied St e Di t itJudge t at s s rc R espondent . By o ni a or re e e i J nua y 2002,t c tdimis d t spe ii f awrt pi on nd de nt r d n a r he our s s e hi tton or i öfha s c pust bea or mder28 U. C.j2254,tld by Hemy Chrsin Olen,a Vigi a i t S. ie ita s r ni nmae p o e dn pr K .Ole sa pe lo t a j d me twa d s se Ole ha mo e ml r u r c e ig o s n' p a f h t u g n s imisd. s n s v d meo s tm e snc t n f rr c i r to oft de a ofha a r if wihouts c s Henow sl i s i e he o e onsde ai n he nil be s ele , t uc es . es aû oint Ha eS aesP o e u a Dea lt ves d'amoin fra p it n o c u s l & to o v tt' r c d rl fur Re re , M q ' to o p on me t f o n e, a d amoin t p o e d j f r p u ei. ( Nos 7 - . Lie Ole sma y p e iu n t o r c e . o ma a p rs ECF o q . 9 81) k s n' n r vo s m otons t i t ntm o i s e ng r ve s mus be de ed a wihoutm e i. i , he nsa ton e ki e r al t ni s t rt Ole smo inf rr v ra o t h be s ud me tmus b a d e s du d rRue6 o s n' to o e es l f he a a j g n t e d rse n e l 0 f t eFe e a Ru e o Ci lPr c d r . Rul 60b a t o ie r le fo acvl u g n b sd h d r l ls f vi o e u e e () u h rz s eif rm i ij d me t a e on, n mong ot r t ngs Smit ke, i dvere he hi , G sa na tnce, s prs , or e us bl ne e t' C wl ur ie xc a e gl c ' G y ne d so e e e i e c , G ru . . y a o p i pat, v in s o t ej d me t o t n oh r ic v r d v d n e' l a d . b n p osng ry ' od e s f h u g n , r ç y t e 'f ' a ra o t a j siisr le. Rue 6 ()1 ,() ( ) ( ) & () Reifl e ti r l i a e s n h t u tfe eif' l 0b () 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 . le md r h s ue s n ' Olsen v. Angelone e ta r iay r me y a d s o l b ivo d o l whe G p rpraet a c pp ih j tc ' i xr o dn r e d n h u d e n ke ny n s p o it o c o ls usie' n a Doc. 82 G iuai nsi vi e r r na y cr lmsanc . Do lv.St t Fa m Fie Cas Aut I tr l t to nvol ng xtao di r icl t es' wel s ' ae r r . o nsl. Co,9 3 F.d 46 4 ( t Ci.1 9 ) t u h cru tn e wilr rl o c i t e h b a . 9 2 , 8 4h r 9 3 . G c ic msa c s l aey c ur n h a e s s c e . Gonzaesv. os 545U. 5 535( ) ontxt' ' l Cr bv, S. 24, 2005 . Dockets.Justia.com A Rul 6 ( )moin ta s e s t rv staj g n ds si g a j 2 5 p tto a e 0 b to h t e k o e ii ud me t imisn 2 4 ei n s i wiho m e i s d be dim is a a s c sve habe pe ii n t pr ventpe ii ne s fom t ut rt houl s s ed s uc es i as tto o e tto r r u ig s c amoint cr l e tt er l i 2 U. C.j2 4 ( b rig s c s iep tto . sn u h to o icl n h ue n 8 S. mv 2 4 1 arn uc e sv ei ns $, i JZa 5 - 2 Hee Ole c le g sti c u tsfn i o p o e u a d fulu d rRue6 () #.t 313 . r, s n haln e l s o r' idng f r c d rl ea t n e l 0b , l s t c tma a es hi c e i unde t tnze.J=a 532. o he our y ddr s s ontntons r ha l ..t / Forr a onsale dy sa e i pro m e a um o ni ns howeve ,t m o i n mus be es r a tt d n i r mor nd pi o , r he to t de e Ole m e e y r r s t pr dur lde a tis t tt c tha ar ady decded nid. s n r l ea gue he oce a f ul s ue ha he our s le i a an thm. ( e ,eg,Opn o 2- ,ECF No 1 ;Op no 3 4 ECF No.5 ) Th c u ti g is i S e .. ii n 3 . 3 i in - , 6. e o r s s ts d t t t de ii n was c r c t a y pr ed a de a tprncpls t ba r vi w of a ife ha he c so ore t o ppl oc ur l f ul i i e o r e e Ole sf de a ha asc am so t m e is M o e r ast c thaspr vi l f t d,e n s n' e r l be l i n he rt . r ove , he our e ousy om ve i Ole c d s w c us f hi de a tt r sa e pr e alr l s he cn f s n oul ho a e or s f ul mde tt oc dur u e , nnots w a m a ho c l p eu ie S eCo e n v. o o 5 U. 7 2 7 0( 9 )( rig fd r l b a rve rj dc . e lma Th mps n, 01 S. 2 , 5 1 91 barn e ea ha e s e iw of pr edlal de a t d cli a e a s oc tr ly f ule a m bs nt howi of c us f r t de a t a r uli ng a e o he f ul nd es tng P eu ie. rj dc ) Fort sa e r as ,t c tmus de Olen' m o i f r co i r ton,a wil he tt d e ons he our t ny s s ton or e nsde a i nd l dimi shi r m ani m otonsa m oot An a oprae o derwilis t sda s s s e i ng i s . ppr i t r l s ue hi y. The ce k wil s nd a co oft s or r t pe ii r a t c lr l e py hi de o ttone nd o ouns lof r co d f t e e r or he r ponde . es nt ENTER: Thi t * d y o t b r 201 s Z- a foco e, 7. ' U nie St t s Di t i tJ t d a e s rc udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
