Utley v. Utley, No. 5:2018cv00064 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/11/2018. (jv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Utley v. Utley Doc. 4 I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D ISTRI CO U RT CT FO R TH E W E STERN D I STRI O F VI GI I CT R N A H ARRI SON BU RG D I VISION (Lt. s 7:;, . )ï.:. t sj v eotxv :/(; k op ,mxàs , sw i t $ aj)g( . yy , ) f , , . D AN I L F . UT LEY , E . yk7)jg 2 j t4 N .y jg Cas èê 5:18-cv-00064 e o.5: cv00021 18 Pl ntf, ai if J.- tv . DU t!. // . iY' ,. ' ' , C1 Fr x By: M i chaelF.U r bans ki Chi fUnie S a e Di ti t udge e t d t t s s rc J J N Y FE UTLEY, EN D ef endant . M E M O M N D U M O PI I N N O Pr c el g p o s , antf Da ilF. ly(< . ly' fld t ei tntComp an o e cn r e pli if ne Ute < Ut ' i h nsa i Mr e l e li t (hc< mpli 'o t t f co ant: r < Comp.)ECF No. l teac mpa igo d re trdwihti l', ' 2.n h c o nyn r e nce t ls l m e or ndum opi on,t c twilgt ntM r Ute la t pr e i f m a a ersdue m a ni he our l a . ly e ve o oce d n or u i t hi i gence Afe r viwi t Com pl i ,t cour c l o s ndi . t r e e ng he ant he t oncudest tt ac i m us be ha he ton t d s se f lc ofurs it pu s ntt 28U.. j 1 3 a 1 1 ()2 ( ( -() imisd or a k j idc i on, rua o SC. j 3 2 nd 9 5e ()B)i i . ) i Undc 28U. C. 1 5 dititc rsha ead yt s r e i iilfl g a ds ns r S. j 91 , src ou t v ut o c e n nta ii s nd inis n ac ompli fl i f m a a e i (a any tm e i t cour det m i st ...t ant ied n or u rs tt i f he t er ne hat he a t . .sfi l o.m aii s. .( jfist saeacam onwl c r l fm a be c i . i rvoous r l ou . ol al o tt li on c a h ei y i e g a td. 2 U. C. 1 1 ()2 ( ( -() s eas Erl eCo. . v. o s , 4 F.d 6 8 r n e ' 8 S. j 9 5e ()B)i i ; e lo in ' ) i i SA. - hn on 4 0 3 4 , l 6 6 ( h Ci. 0 6 ( e na q tto orit d rt e t )1 1 p rnisd src c urst 5 4t r 2 0 ) i r l uo ains n te ) g ci 9 5 e t t itit o t o nt s on i pe nty as es t m e isofi f m a a e i c pli s a t e l szt t t nde nde l s s he rt n ot u rs om ant, nd o xcude lis ha h veno ag bl bai i lw o fc . a r ua e ss n a r a t). ' The c tc tues r s c pli slbe al,i posng çls srnge sa r our onsr o e om a nt i r ly m i Ke s ti nt tnda ds t n f z lpe d n sd atd b lwy z . Erc s n v Pa d ,5 1U.. ,9 ( 0 7 ha o ma la i g r fe y a e s' ik o . r us 5 S 89 4 2 0 ) ' Dockets.Justia.com (uo ig Esel v. mbl, 9U.. 7, 0 05(97 ). ehee s < c mpli mu t q tn tl Ga e 42 S 9 1 4- 1 6) Non t ls,< o ant s e a cont i s fce f ct lm ate ,a e ed a tue,t ft t a cam oft left ti plusbl an ufii nt a ua tt cc pt s r o s ae li ei ha s a i e onisfc .' hc o tv. ba,5 6U.. 6 , 7 (0 9 (uo igBel l Co . t a e' As r f 1 l 5 S 6 2 6 8 2 0 ) q tn lAt. ' v. Two , 5 U. 5 4 5 0 (0 7 . mbl 5 0 S. 4 , 7 2 0 ) Ft t c rs e ,i a om he ove he t t ppea st M r Ute a guest tt cour c exe cs r hat . l y r ha he t an r ie dve st j rs cin, sde e da l nn FeUte (t . lf) i pu po tdyact e o i riy u idito a fn nt e y ly ( Ut s r re l ii n f Ms e z t Phii ne .Ci lCove Shee ,ECF N o.2- Butfdititcour ss l notha orgi l he lppi s vi r t 1. f s rc t hal ve i na gie stjjrs ito . . a a tonbea e n ct e ofaS aea ct e ofaf r in dv ri u id cin . of n ci tv e ii ns y z tt nd ii ns z o eg sa ewho a e lwf l a nit f pe m a ntr sdencei t Unie St t a e not tt r a uly dr ted or r ne e i n he t d aes r do ncldi t esm cStt. 28U. C. 1 3 a() M r Ut ycamst t1 hhea d M r. t iie n h a ae' ; S. j 3 2()2 . . l li ha 3 e 0t n s U te lve i W oods oc Vigi a. vi Cove She ,ECF N o. 1. ss h,t c tca ly i n t k, t ni Ci l r et 2- A uc he our n e r iedve st j idc in o yi M r. lyi n alg lp r ne r sde oft e xe cs i riy urs ito nl f s Ute s ot e a e ma nt e i nt h U nie St t . r Ute doe notpla t s whi i f a t hi cam . t d a es M . ly s e d hi, ch s atl o s li Furhe,t c r ma onye e cs dve st jrs it i t a nti t r he ou t y l x t ie i riy u idci f he mou n on c nto ryi gr ae t n $ 50 0 2 U. C. 1 3 a. r Ut ya a st se t er t r o r ve s s e tr ha 7 ,0 . 8 S. j 3 2() M . l ppe r o e k h e u n e ofhi c l en, a he t n m onetr r lef Se Compl at5. s hidr r t r ha a y ei . e . The c tc nnotafot M r our a f d . Ute t r ifhe s e .A sM r Ute fist pl d t r quiie a ounti c t r y, ly he ele e ks . ly al o ea he e st m n ont ove s a an, h c u tc n e e cs dve st jrsl to o rt eCo ant g i t e o r a not x r ie i riy u iccin ve h mpli . i Acor n l,hec r wi csls Mr Ute 'c mpant t ut eu iep tua c digy t ou t l lris . lys o li wiho prjdc u s nt li a t 28U. C. j1 3 a d 1 5e ()B) f rlc ofjrs ito o S. j 3 2 n 91 ()2 ( $) o a k u idci n. The Cl k i diec e t s nd c esoft sM e or ndum Opi on a t er s r t d o e opi hi m a ni nd he a com pa i O t rt pli if c nyng de o a ntf. Ent ed: Aprl11 2018 er i , 5 M ichaelF.Urbanski . f - r, ' 4 V ClifUnie S ae 't c l g le td tts l t ud e i 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
