Reid v. Carico et al, No. 2:2011cv00031 - Document 173 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER OVERRULING 172 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/13/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF

cÅ v s oFFl U, , sm rnlr cE s Dl . I AT RoANoc , vA FI LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STRI CO U R T CT FO R TH E W ESTER N DI STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A BIG STO N E G A P D IV I N SIO 82 1i 2 1 V 23 JULA k. ' ' I J '' BY; DE W CL E FR ANK E.REI #106381 D, 2, Ci lA c i N o. 11c vi t on 2: v00031 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O M NDUM OPI ON & NI O R DER V. J.C AR I O ,E TA L. C , By: Sam uelG .W ison l Unied St es D i ri Judge t at st ct D ef endant s. Thi m a t ri bef r t c ton pl ntf Fr nk E. i s Ã§M o i n t A lera O b a n s te s o e he our ai i f n Re d' , & t o o t nd t i Reiffom J me 'g ke le No.1 sgne byRedonOcobe 21 201 bu not le r udge nt'Doc t tm 72j i d i t r , 3, t r c i e b t c u t ni No e e 6 2 3.I t eitrm, u yhe r t ec s a dr tn e e ev d y he o r u tl v mb r , 01 n h n ei aj r ad h a e n eu zd avediti fvoroft dee nt ( t r29, 3 , rcna he fnda s Ocobe 201 ) uponwhiht c tt n e e e c he our he ntr d j me ( obe 30,201 .Rei as t cour t r c i t M agitaeJ udg nt Oct r 3) d ks he t o e onsder he srt udge' nzi of s lng Ocobe 22,201 de ng Re d' m oton f acontnuanc oft ti lda e.De pie isname t r 3 nyi i s i or i e he ra t s t t , t ec u t l c nsr eRed' fln a a o j cint e Fe ea Rueo Cii Pr c d r 7 () h o r wil o tu i s iig s n b e to md r d rl l f v l o e u e 2 a a ove r e i. nd r ul t Un e Fe e a Rul o Cii Pr c d r 7 () adsrc j dg mus mo iyorsta ie d r d rl e f v l o e u e 2 a, ititu e t df e sd a pa tofa cont t d or r r ed on by a M a s r t J ny r es e de ul gi t a e udge t ti cl dy er one orc r r ha s ea r ous ont a y t l Alhought c tdi no rceveRed' ob e toni tmet r eo ibef etil i o aw. t he our d t e i i s j ci n i o ul n t or ra,n r t os c ,Re d' c e ns a e r pe t i s onc r boutpr ee ng t t i lw ihou c m s ass he e on Oc obe oc di o r a t t ot el c dul d t r 28,201 di notbe rout 3 d a .The c ttndst ca ewasf ry tid, wihsa ngRed' our i he s ail re not t t ndi i s r pr s nt ton ofhi s l. Pr ee ngwih t c eass he e a s di notpr c udeRe d fom e e e ai m ef oc di t he ms c dul d lo d el i r p e e tn s f in e i e c t tej r ,n ldn lv tsi n b mulpl imaewin s e . r sn ig u fce t v d n e o h u y icu ig ie e tmo y y t e n t t e s s i The c t sm i uloft f c t tR e d f l d hi cm e m or t t o ye r a a had our i ndf he a t ha i ie s s e han w a s go nd c i nce g a ed t e pr vi ustm e . W ih ltl m or t n awee l tbe or ti ,Re d ontnua s r nt hr e e o i s t ite e ha k ef f e ral i efecua e t r m ova ofhi c f t t d he e l s ouns la a n a ke f a c i nce The c ttndst e nd gai s d or ontnua . our i he M a sr t J git a e udge' r lng de ng a c i nce w a notcl ary e s ui nyi ontnua s e l none o c r r t l w , ous r onta y o a a re wi ter ln , n c n ld sRed so j cins o l b o e ze . g e s t h uig a d o cu e i' b e to h u d e v m ld h Ac o dn l i i hee yORDERED a dADJ c r igy,t s rb n UDGED ta Red so j cin g c e h t i' b e to Do k t Ie No 1 2 i OVERRULED.TheClr i drce t malac p o t i o d rt t tm . 7 ) s ek s ie td o i o y f hs r e o he pl ntf. ai if E r R: vmbr JA,03 xr xoe e/ '21. s .' . .' . . z . , 0 * v, M. f- ... .M - . r m .+ .. .M . ,' ' .'. '' z ' . Az .. s .. w v .7 I TE STA TES D I STRI J DG E CT U

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.