Pennington v. General Dynamics, No. 1:2012cv00063 - Document 27 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 7/2/13. (eps)

Download PDF
cuERx' oFyl u. ol couR' s cE s sm r AT Ro j I THE UN I N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R THE W ESTERN D I I OF V I GI I STR CT R N A A BIN GD ON DI I V SION r/13 jje u2 ) jj s s o x JUL C3 JULI . D EY CL K A C s: v E 2 CLERK D EBOR AH K .PEN N I GTON , N Ci lAc i N o.1: 2CV 00063 vi ton 1 Pl ntf , ai if M EM O M ND U M O PI IO N N G EN ERA L D YN AM I S ARM A M EN T C AN D TECHN I CAL PR OD U CTS,I C. N , By:Hon. l E. G en Conr d a Chi U nie St t sD i t i tJ ge ef t d a e s rc ud D e e nt f nda . D e a K .Pe m i on f l d t sac i n a i tG e r lDynam i A r n e a bor h l ngt ie hi t o ga ns ne a cs m m nt nd Tec ca Pr ducs l (l nea Dyna c')ase tngcamsofdici nai unde Til VI hni l o t,nc. k rl Ge mis', sri li s rmi ton r te l oft Ci lRi t Ac of1 (dil Vl' ,heAmei nswih Dia ltesAc of1 0 he vi ghs t 964 dfte I' t ) rca t sbiii t 99 ($ k ADA'5a t Fa l M e ca Lea Ac o 19 ($ ' nd he miy di l ve t f 93 t ) FMLA'. Theca ei prs ntybeor ' ) s s ee l f e t c t t def nda ' pa tal o i t di m i s Fort r a onst tf l , hem oton w il he our on he e nt s ri m ton o s s . he e s ha olow t i l be gr nt d. a e Backaround Pe ngt i a f m e e pl e ofG e r lDyna i ,w ho s f r f om s ve e nni on s or r m oye ne a m cs uf e s r e r de e s on. H e em pl e w a t r i t d on Oc o r 1 201 a t s ha t ke l ve pr s i r oym nt s e m na e t be 4, 1, fer he d a n ea bec us ofhe m e a he t c to a e r nt l alh ondii n. O n ora boutM a c 1 201 Pe ng on fl a c r e ofdi c i i ton w ih t Equa r h 9, 2, nni t ied ha g s rm na i t he l Pennington v. General Dynamics Doc. 27 Empl oymentOpporuniyCommison(i t t si $ EEOC',algi vi ainsofTil Vl a t ADA. ' le ng olto ) te 1 nd he Thereafer Penni on recei a r ghtt sue l t f om t EEO C,w hi advi ed hert she t, ngt ved i -o- eter r he ch s hat m us fl a l sui under Til V I and/ t AD A w ihi 90 days ofr vi t l t The t ie aw t te 1 or he t n ecei ng he eter. lte i caest ti wa maldonJ 28,201 ( e tr ndi t ha t s ie une 2. Compl Ex.1) . . Dockets.Justia.com t panifsil a 8 d y t fl hsc mp an ) As u y 5 9F. u p. da 7 0(q ia l he litf tl h d 4 a s o ie i o lit; b r , 9 S p 2 t 2 e utbe t lngwasnotwa rnt wheet pli ifsilhad78da t fl he c ant;Beaev. oli ra ed r he antf tl ys o ie r ompli ) l Buri on CoatFa tr 36F.Supp. 702,705( D. 1 (quia et lngwa no lngt co y, 2d E. Va. 999) e tbl oli s t warntdwheet pli ifsilha 60da t fl hi c ant. ra e r he antf tl d ys o ie s ompli ) C oncl i us on Fort r s sa e t cou tc l t tPe ngt n' cam sunde Til VI a t he ea ons t t d,he r oncudes ha nni o s li r te I nd he A DA a e tm e ba r r i - r ed. A cc r i y, he c ur w il ml t def nda ' pa ta m oton t di m i s. o d ngl t o t l gr t he e nt s ri l i o s s The Cl r i die t d t s nd ce tt e c esoft sm e or nd opi o a t ek s rce o e rii d opi hi m a um ni n nd he a om pa ng or rt a lc cc nyi de o 1 ouns lofr c d. e e or ENTER : hs %ê dyoJl,03 Ti a fuy2 1. Chi U nied St es Di t i J ef t at s rct udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.