Pierce v. Hudson et al, No. 3:2023cv00057 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 3/23/2023. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pierce v. Hudson et al Doc. 6 Case 3:23-cv-00057-RCY-MRC Document 6 Filed 03/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CHRISTOPHER PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:23CV57 (RCY) KEVIN A. HUDSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on January 31, 2023, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff s civil action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court s order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a). Plaintiff s conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ Roderick C. Young United States District Judge Date: March 23, 2023 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
