Frye v. White et al, No. 3:2020cv00617 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/29/2020. (asho, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Frye v. White et al Case 3:20-cv-00617-HEH-RCY Document 3 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 8 Doc. 3 m THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JARNAY FRYE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:20CV617-HEH V. MS.FNU WHITE,etai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on August 25, 2020,the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. The Court directed Plaintiff to return his informa pauperis affidavit and affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection offees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either ofthe above directives within thirty (30)days ofthe date ofentry thereof would result in summaiy dismissal ofthe action. Plaintiff has not complied with the order ofthis Court. Plaintiff failed to return the informa pauperis affidavit and a consent to collection offees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall issue. , ^ /S/ HENRY E.HUDSON Date: SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
