Snow v. Mills, No. 3:2020cv00170 - Document 12 (E.D. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/21/2020. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )

Download PDF
Snow v. Mills Doc. 12 Case 3:20-cv-00170-HEH-RCY Document 12 Filed 05/21/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JEFFREY T. SNOW, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:20CV170-HEH GARY A. MILLS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) On March 18, 2020, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed informa pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on April 10, 2020,the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of$17.50 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven(11) days ofthe date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). On April 20, 2020,Plaintiff filed a second copy of an informa pauperis affidavit. By Memorandum Order entered on April 22, 2020, the Court noted:"Within eleven(11) days ofthe date of entry hereof. Plaintiff must submit an initial partial filing fee of$17.50 or state under penalty of perjury that he does not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Mailing an informa pauperis affidavit to the Court fails to satisfy this directive." (ECF No. 11, at 1.) Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:20-cv-00170-HEH-RCY Document 12 Filed 05/21/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 40 informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard ofthe Courfs directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ Date:*!?)»>* 2^-te2g> Richmond,Virginia HENRY E.HUDSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.