Day v. Walker et al, No. 3:2020cv00089 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 5/11/2020. (sbea,)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Day v. Walker et al Doc. 5 Case 3:20-cv-00089-JAG-RCY Document 5 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MARIO DAY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:20CV89 SGT. P. WALKER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on February 26, 2020, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff’s action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff’s conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: 11 May 2020 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
