Sirleaf et al v. Northam et al, No. 3:2019cv00712 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 10/7/2019. (sbea, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sirleaf et al v. Northam et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:19CV712 RALPH NORTHAM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia prisoner proceeding prose, submitted this civil action that was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Plaintiff is a frequent litigant in this Court and has three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the Complaint filed in this action and finds that the Court has already reviewed and dismissed the identical complaint with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Sirleaf v. Ralph Northam, No. 3:19CV182 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6, 2019); ECF Nos. 13, 17, 18. Plaintiff may not relitigate these claims. The Court also finds that Plaintiff filed this action in Maryland in bad faith. Thus, for the reasons previously stated, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and malicious and for failure to state a claim. The Clerk will be DIRECTED to note the disposition for the purposes of 28 U. S.C. § 191 S(g). An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Isl M. Hannah Lauck United States/District Judge UC T - 7 2019 , M. Hannah Lauck United States District Judge Date: Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
