Sirleaf v. Amor Correctional Health Service$ Inc. et al, No. 3:2019cv00711 - Document 7 (E.D. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 1/3/2020. Copy to Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, )

Download PDF
Sirleaf v. Amor Correctional Health Service$ Inc. et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,JR., Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No.3:19CV711 ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES,INC.,et al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on October 24,2019,the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs civil action. At that time,the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a statement under oath or penalty of peijury that: (A) (B) Identifies the nature of the action; States his belief that he is entitled to relief; (C) Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give security therefor; and, (D) Includes a statement ofthe assets he possesses. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(1). The Court provided Plaintiff with an informa pauperis affidavit form for this purpose. Additionally, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee . by signing and returning a consent to the collection offees form. The Court warned Plaintiffthat a failure to comply with either of the above directives vwthin thirty(30)days ofthe date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff has not complied with the orders ofthis Court. Plaintifffailed to return a completed informa pauperis affidavit form and a consent to collection offees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M. Hannah! United Statefe DfetTict Judge Date: JAN - 3 2020 Richmond, Virginia

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.