Demos v. Epstein et al, No. 3:2019cv00643 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/01/2019. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Demos v. Epstein et al Doc. 3 IN THE tJNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT - I 2019 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOIMd va JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 3:19CV643 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION John Robert Demos, a Washington state inmate, submitted this civil action and applied to proceed iji forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Demos has scores of actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 33 F. App'x 918, 919-20 (10th Cir. See Demos v. Keating, 2002). Demos's current complaint does not demonstrate that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
