Bolding v. Wright et al, No. 3:2019cv00499 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Serve Defendants). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/24/2020. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bolding v. Wright et al Doc. 17 Case 3:19-cv-00499-HEH-EWH Document 17 Filed 11/24/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JAMAR DANTE HOLDING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:19CV499-HEH V. LISA M. WRIGHT,et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Serve Defendants) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, brings this action. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m),Plaintiff had ninety (90)days to serve the defendants. Here, that period commenced on July 9,2020. More than ninety (90)days elapsed and Plaintiff had not served the defendants. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on October 16, 2020,the Court directed Plaintiff, within eleven(11)days ofthe date of entry thereof, to show good cause why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to serve the defendants. Plaintiff has not responded to the October 16, 2020 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall be issued. It is so ORDERED. my « Henry E. Hudson Date: Nov.ZH^ Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
