Tanthongsack v. Crawford et al, No. 3:2019cv00340 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/28/2019. (Copy sent to Petitioner) (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tanthongsack v. Crawford et al Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KONGMANY TANTHONGSACK, Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:19CV340 JEFFREY CRAWFORD,et aL, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a federal detainee proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition. Petitioner asked the Court to return a filed copy to him upon receipt and the Clerk mailed him such a copy. On May 16, 2019,the United States Postal Service returned the requested copy to the Court marked,"RELEASED." Since that date. Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to keep the Court advised as to his current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting the action. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M.Hannah L| United States Date: MAY 2 8 2019 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
