Perez-Amata v. O'Grady et al, No. 3:2019cv00213 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 05/30/2019. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )

Download PDF
Perez-Amata v. O'Grady et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA L Richmond Division 3 0 2019 GABRIEL HOSMAN CLERK, U.S. DISTRICTCOURT RICHMOND. VA PEREZ-AMATA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:19CV213-HEH V. LIAM O'GRADY, etaL, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on April 15, 2019, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. The Court directed Plaintiff to return his informa pauperis affidavitand affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiffhas not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the informapauperis affidavit and a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instantaction. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.