Farthing v. Godfrey et al, No. 3:2019cv00195 - Document 11 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 07/30/2019. (Copy copies as distributed) (smej, )

Download PDF
Farthing v. Godfrey et al Doc. 11 L I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division R\ JUL 3 0 2019 I CLERK, U.srDlsTRlCT COURT SEAUN FARTHING, RiCMMOh.'D, VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:19CV195-HEH V. LT. I. GODFREY,et ai, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on May 6, 2019,the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of$11.66 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days ofthe date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, on May 30, 2019,the Court granted Plaintiff a fifteen(15) day extension oftime to pay the filing fee. More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard ofthe Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ HENRY E. HUDSON Date: 3^ 2015 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmoncf, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.