Blake v. Grimes et al, No. 3:2019cv00168 - Document 4 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 5/13/2019. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blake v. Grimes et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division BRIAN JOSEPH BLAKE, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:19CV168 LT. COL. PHILLIP GRIMES, ^ al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on March 29, 2019, the Court conditionally docketed this action. At that time, the Court directed Brian Joseph Blake to submit a statement under oath or penalty of perjury that: (A) (B) Identifies the nature of the action; States his belief that he is entitled to relief; (C) Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give (D) security therefor; and, Includes a statement of the assets he possesses. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Court provided Blake with an in forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose. Additionally, the Court directed Blake to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Blake that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Dockets.Justia.com Blake has not complied with the order of this Court. failed to return the forma pauperis affidavit and the consent to collection of fees form. in forma statutory § 1914(a). prosecute. pauperis filing Such status. fee Blake for conduct As a result, he does not qualify for Furthermore, the instant demonstrates See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). he has action. a not paid the See willful 28 U.S.C. failure to Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Blake. /s/ Ml- Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date: Richmond, Vdwrginia
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
