Webster v. Clarke, No. 3:2019cv00098 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 4/22/2019. Copy to Petitioner as directed. (jsmi, )

Download PDF
Webster v. Clarke Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ISEL KEITH WEBSTER, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLRKE, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:19CV98-HEH MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing 28 U.S.C § 2254 Petition Without Prejudice) Petitioner, proceeding prose, submitted a petition or a writ of habeas copus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Memorandum Order entered on February 26, 2019, the Court directed Petitioner to complete and retun, within iteen days of the date of eny thereof, an afidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauper is or pay the $5.00 iling fee. More than iteen (15) days have passed and Petitioner has not retuned the required in forma pauper is afidavit. Petitioner also has ailed to pay the assessed fee or adequately explain any special circumstances warranting excuse rom payment. Accordingly, the§ 2254 petition will be dismissed without prejudice. A certiicate of appealability will be denied. n appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Isl HENRY E. HUDSON SENIOR NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.