Chestnut v. Bolster, No. 3:2018cv00791 - Document 8 (E.D. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 2/19/19. (Copy mailed)(jtho, )

Download PDF
Chestnut v. Bolster Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:18CV791 MARK BOLSTER, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a Virginia state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition. By Memorandum Order entered on January 9, 2019, the Court directed Petitioner, within eleven (11)days of the date of entry thereof, to pay the $5.00 filing fee or e.xplain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment of the filing fee. The Court warned Petitioner it would dismiss the action if Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment of the filing fee. More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the January 9, 2019 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M. HannaiTLiu Date: V 20J3 United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.