Williams v. Clarke, No. 3:2018cv00747 - Document 23 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 08/02/2019. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Clarke Doc. 23 s. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA flUG-22019 z) Richmond Division CLERK, VINCENT EUGENE WILLIAMS, DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND.Va Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. HAROLD W. 3:18CV747 CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Vincent Eugene Williams, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, brings this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 2254 Petition," ECF No. 1)^ challenging his convictions in the Circuit Court for the County of Henrico, Virginia ("Circuit Court") for grand larceny and possession of burglary tools with intent to commit larceny. Williams contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel by counsel's failure to properly challenge the loss of stationary camera video footage in a motion for a new trial. (Id. at 16.) Respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that Williams's claim lacks merit. the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) For reasons set forth below, will be granted. 1 The Court utilizes the pagination assigned to Williams's § 2254 Petition by the CM/ECF docketing system. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
