Woodington v. Mrs. Goode et al, No. 3:2018cv00693 - Document 35 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/26/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Woodington v. Mrs. Goode et al Doc. 35 rrr IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FsaeaBB Richmond Division W CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA ' JUSTIN PAUL WOODINGTON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.3:18CV693 ) MRS. GOODE, etai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Serve Defendants) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, brings this action. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff has 90 days to serve the defendants. Here, that period commenced on October 1, 2019. More than 90 days elapsed and Plaintiff had not served the defendants. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on January 13, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff, within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof, to show good cause why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to serve the defendants. Plaintiff has not responded to the January 13,2020 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall issue. It is so ORDERED. is/ Date:f;i2t aoao Henry E. Hudson Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
