Jackson v. Ormond, No. 3:2018cv00601 - Document 13 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/30/2020. Copy to Jackson as directed. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. Ormond Doc. 13 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 109 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DERRICK JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:18CV601 J. RAY ORMOND, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Derrick Jackson, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1.) ("§ 2241 Petition," Jackson contends that he was improperly classified as a career offender in light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015) and Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 251 (2013). The Government filed a RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION UNDER § 2241. Opposition," ECF No. 9.) REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO ("Response in Thereafter, Jackson filed a PETITIONER'S RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION. ("Reply," ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the § 2241 Petition will be denied. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND CLAIMS On September 19, 1996, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland ("Sentencing Court") Jackson was charged with possession with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine (Count One) and possession of a firearm by a convicted Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 110 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 111 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 112 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 113 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 114 Case 3:18-cv-00601-REP-RCY Document 13 Filed 12/30/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 115
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
