Chapman v. Smith et al, No. 3:2018cv00597 - Document 161 (E.D. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 3/3/2021. Copies distributed as directed.(asho, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Chapman v. Smith et al Doc. 161 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1922 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 2 of 18 PageID# 1923 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 3 of 18 PageID# 1924 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 4 of 18 PageID# 1925 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 5 of 18 PageID# 1926 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 6 of 18 PageID# 1927 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 7 of 18 PageID# 1928 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 8 of 18 PageID# 1929 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 9 of 18 PageID# 1930 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 10 of 18 PageID# 1931 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 11 of 18 PageID# 1932 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 12 of 18 PageID# 1933 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 13 of 18 PageID# 1934 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 14 of 18 PageID# 1935 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 15 of 18 PageID# 1936 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 16 of 18 PageID# 1937 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 17 of 18 PageID# 1938 Case 3:18-cv-00597-JAG-RCY Document 161 Filed 03/03/21 Page 18 of 18 PageID# 1939 V. Conclusion The Eighth Amendment claims raised in Claims One (a), Two (a), Three (a), Five (a), Six (a), and Seven will be DISMISSED. The Equal Protection claims under the United States and Virginia Constitutions raised in Claim One (b) will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Equal Protection claims under the United States and Virginia Constitutions raised in Claims Two (b), Three (b), Five (b), and Six (b) will be DISMISSED. Chapman's Rule 54(b) Motion (ECF No. 156) will be DENIED. All of Chapman's other outstanding motions (ECF Nos. 95, 107, 109, 123, 125, 127, 130, 133, 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 147, 148, 149, 150, and, 158) will be DENIED AS MOOT. This action will be DISMISSED. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Is/ Date: '} March 2021 Richmond, Virginia John A. Gibney, Jr. United States District Jud e 18
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
