Mohammed v. Dr. Bomar et al, No. 3:2018cv00466 - Document 8 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 08/22/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mohammed v. Dr. Bomar et al Doc. 8 8 I E IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Mfi 222018 El Richmond Division CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMONn HADI MOHAMMED, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:18CV466-HEH V. DR. BOMAR,et ai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) On July 17, 2018, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed informa pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on July 31, 2018(EOF No. 7), the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $62.33 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven(11)days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal ofthe action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ Date:{in5j^^g HENRY E. HUDSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
