Prasad v. Chesterfield Police Dept. et al, No. 3:2018cv00307 - Document 2 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/21/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Prasad v. Chesterfield Police Dept. et al Doc. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division SUNDARI K. PRASAD, Plainti, Civil Action No. 3:18CV307 V. CHESTERFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintif, a Virginia inmate, has submitted this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [informa pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any acility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or ails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical ijuy. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintif has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as rivolous or or ailure to state a claim. See, e.g., Prasadv. Berger, No. 3: 17CV74, 2018 WL icial lnq. & Review Comm 'n., 2088749, at *6 (E.D. Va. May 4, 2018); Prasadv. Jud No. 3:17CV498, 2018 WL 2015809, at *4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2018); Prasadv. Gothic Beauy Magazine, No. 3:17CV446, 2018 WL 1863650, *5 (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2018); Prasadv. United States, No. 3:17CV510, 2018 WL 1143597, at *4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2018); Prasadv. Washington Metro Police Dep 't, No. 3:l 7CV140, 2018 WL 1091999, at *4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2018); Prasadv. Karn Art Inc., No. 3:17CV62, 2017 WL 5012591, at *4 (E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2017), af'd712 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2018); Prasadv. Delta Sigma Theta Sororiy, Inc., No. 3:16CV897, 2017 WL 4399551, at *5 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2017), af'd112 F. App'x 336 (4th Dockets.Justia.com June 21, 2018
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
