O'Connor v. United States, No. 3:2018cv00297 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 06/25/2018. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff. (tjoh, )

Download PDF
O'Connor v. United States Doc. 3 1 L 0 JUN 25 2# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division i) CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA MICHAEL B. O'CONNOR, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:18CV297-HEH V. UNITED STATES, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice) Petitioner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a letter. (ECF No. I.) Given the content of this document, the Court found it was appropriate to give Petitioner the opportunity to pursue this action as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. SeeRivenbarkv. Virginia, 305 F. App'x 144, 145 (4th Cir. 2008). By Memorandum Order entered on May 10, 2018, the Court directed Petitioner, within twenty(20) days ofthe date of entry thereof, to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition. The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the terms ofthe May 10, 2018 Memorandum Order would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than twenty(20) days have elapsed and Petitioner has not completed and returned the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition or otherwise responded to the Dockets.Justia.com May 10, 2018 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability will be denied. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion /./ Date: a.:? Richmond, Virginia Henry E. Hudson Senior United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.