Mayo v. Herring, No. 3:2018cv00231 - Document 9 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/19/2018. (Copy mailed to Petitioner) (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mayo v. Herring Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JONATHAN ONEIL MAYO, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3;18CV231 MARK HERRING, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a Virginia state prisoner proceeding pro se^ submitted a 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition. By Memorandum Order entered on October 9,2018, the Court directed Petitioner to show good cause as to why the action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. On October 18, 2018,the United States Postal Service returned the October 9, 2018 Memorandum Order to the Court marked,"NOT IN OUR FACILITY." Since that date. Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to keep the Court advised as to his current address indicates his lack ofinterest in prosecuting the action. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M. HannaH L u [qjc United States'District Judge Date: NOV 1 9 2018 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
