Tippens, Jr. v. Clarke, No. 3:2017cv00784 - Document 14 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 04/12/2018. Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Petitioner as directed.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tippens, Jr. v. Clarke Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR., Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:17CV784-HEH V. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1), a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Injunctive Relief, a Motion for Three Judges, a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and a Complaint (ECF No. 2), and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 3.) In these submissions, it appeared that Petitioner complained about his conditions of confinement, not the fact or duration of his confinement. ByMemorandum Order entered on December 5, 2017, the Court informed Petitioner that it would take no action on his current submissions, and denied his motions without prejudice. The Court also directed Petitioner to complete the form for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and retum the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court warned Petitioner that a failure to complete the form and retum the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
